I’m Mad As Hell (Part 1)

Morris Segall      domestic policy, economy, globalization, recession, trends

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

The above mantra from the movie “Network” is but one symptom of the increasing social, emotional, physical and political cost of the worldwide recession which is now entering its second year.  For those of you that have been following our commentaries over the past three years you know that we have written extensively on the financial and economic trends and developments that have led to the current severe worldwide recession and our views of the reactions of the U.S. and foreign governments to this recession. However, the length and severity of this recession are causing in our opinion additional high, and we believe, long lasting social, physical and political costs that will represent significant changes in worldwide economic growth and social and political attitudes, particularly in the U.S., going forward.

As we have been stating for some time, this recession was initially caused by the bursting of the housing bubble here in the U.S. which then spread to the financial system and finally to the business, non-residential real estate and state and local government sectors. The U.S. recession has spread worldwide as our economy contracted and credit losses expanded to overseas banking and export dependent economies. Indeed the negative impacts of recessions overseas are more severe on foreign economies than here in the U.S.

Be sure to subscribe to our blog to read the rest of this ongoing series.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

In the Global Fight Against Recession, Is the U.S. a Party of One?

Morris Segall      bailout, banking system, economy, government, The new Fed actions, their implications and political fallout, treasury

Today the Federal Open Market Committee voted to increase the stimulus to the credit markets by keeping the Fed Funds rate in a 0%-.25% target range. In addition they voted to have the Fed purchase:

• Up to $300 billion of long-term Treasury securities
• Another $100 billion of U.S. Government Agency debt making a total of $200 billion
• An additional $750 billion of mortgage backed securities making a total of $1.25 trillion

In addition the Open Market Committee voted to launch the Treasury’s TALF program to purchase consumer and business asset backed securities. This program will start at $200 billion but could expand to a $1 trillion.

The Fed’s actions are based on what the Open Market Committee states are continued recessionary pressures in the U.S. economy. With today’s actions, the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve is estimated to have expanded to approximately $3 trillion. This compares to assets of less than $1 trillion six months ago. It would seem the Fed is throwing in the towel on a recession bottom in 2009.

This compares to Chairman Ben Bernanke’s testimony on February 14th before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in which he forecast an end to the recession by the end of this year. Clearly there is some disconnect between the Fed’s current actions and the Federal Reserve Chairman’s outlook.

Indeed, the most recent economic data released this month and recent corporate announcements from several large banks indicate there is some hope the pace of economic and earnings contraction may be slowing. We have communicated to our clients and audiences that we felt the worst of the current recession would be felt in the first quarter of this year. If we and Chairman Bernanke are correct, today’s Fed actions are too much at the wrong time and will have negative consequences intermediate-longer term. We warned in our last blog posting, “Is There a Plan Here?” the increasing concern among international creditors about the future creditworthiness of the U.S. government given the outsized spending of the current bailout programs. It is noteworthy that the Chinese government just last week expressed misgivings about their large holdings of U.S. Treasury debt and further purchases going forward. Today’s massive new spending by the Fed will cause further alarm in international financial circles. While today’s announcement of Fed purchases of long term Treasuries suppressed interest rates on government debt and provided fresh fodder for further stock market gains, it is important to note today’s large decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar in currency future markets and the simultaneous large increase in the price of gold futures in commodity markets.

The Federal Open Market Committee is preoccupied with deflation as a result of the current recession. Yet the price of oil has moved to nearly $50 per barrel from approximately $35 per barrel a month ago. In addition the most recent reports on consumer prices for January and February show an annualized rate of inflation of 2.5% excluding food and fuel and inflation and rates much higher in key non discretionary spending categories. The recent rise in energy and service prices belie a chronic deflationary environment or outlook. The unbridled U.S. government and Federal Reserve spending on the multitude of stimulus and bailout programs has been rejected by our overseas trading and financial partners despite this government’s pleas for more foreign government stimulus spending. These governments are afraid of the inflationary bubbles and sovereign balance sheet erosions that will result from such unfettered spending. So the Treasury Dept. and the Fed plot their own course of uncapped spending as their answer to the current credit and economic dilemmas.

Speaking of dilemmas, President Obama is feeling the heat on what is clearly a botched bailout of AIG and an erosion of confidence amongst economists and politicians in Treasury Secretary Geithner. The public is angry and very stressed over the recession. The economy is President’s Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s problem now and the public wants to see results from the hodgepodge programs the government is implementing. The current scandals regarding executive bonuses and the perceived inadequacies of the Treasury leadership will in our opinion start to erode the President’s poll numbers adding a further difficulty to the current social and economic environment.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Is There A Plan Here?

Morris Segall      collapse, economics, economy, failure, future, government, plan, recession, tax, world

Like Alice’s plunge down the rabbit hole, the government’s proposed recovery strategy gets curiouser and curiouser every day!  Rather than helping the consumer to save, pay down his debt and get back into the game, we continue pumping money into faltering and distressed Fortune 1000 companies. Most of these wounded entities have pursued risky and inept business strategies and made ill-advised acquisitions in the last two years.  If BOA is choking on the debt from buying Countrywide Credit and Merrill Lynch, why shouldn’t it be forced to sell off assets to raise capital?   Capital One, already in trouble with underperforming credit card debt, has made two commercial bank acquisitions since 2005, the peak of the housing bubble.  Infusing taxpayer money into these large corporations on the premise that they are too big to fail is just not sound fiscal policy. Perhaps they shouldn’t have been allowed to “get too big to fail” in the merger and acquisition mania of 2005-07. At what point do we hold the senior managements and boards of directors and even the shareholders of these companies accountable for the disastrous decisions that now taxpayers are asked to pay for?  Remember, these are some of the biggest multi-national corporations in the world with supposedly the best managements, at least according to their paychecks. As the song says, “breaking up is hard to do” but we unwound the conglomerates created in the 1960′s in the recessions of 1973-74 and 1980-82. Divestiture raises capital and creates competition.

Rather than keeping banks and other industries on life support with more capital infusions, we should be:

• sending rebate checks to middle class taxpayers earning below $150,000 with an inducement to encourage saving and debt reduction;
• creating a graduated sales tax to help middle and lower income consumers;
• boosting tax revenue by instituting luxury consumption taxes on big-ticket items: luxury cars, boats, second homes, etc.;
• forcing troubled companies to raise capital by selling assets they have acquired;
• repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax for taxpayers earning less than $250,000 in taxable income;
• creating a “WPA” program for unemployed accountants, managers, IT programmers, administrators and researchers to oversee and manage the bailout money and stimulus programs.

The only worthwhile prescription to save struggling banks is for the Federal government to set up a “bad debt bank” to get nonperforming loans off the balance sheets (see our website article, “The Treasury Plan”, Dec. 7, 2007).  Banks won’t lend while they’re strangling on the paper that’s backing bad loans.  A “bad debt bank” will allow the U.S. to renegotiate bad loans, forestall foreclosures and hold bad assets for long-term resale. It’s the only way we’re going to free the banks and credit intermediaries to make new loans.

Now the President wants to curtail the tax deductions for charitable giving and mortgage interest on upper income taxpayers just as we are trying to stimulate housing and asking charities to do more in this recession.  Cutting back on deductions for mortgage interest and charitable donations would be disastrous!  Rather than raising revenue, the former would stop many upper income homebuyers in their tracks. The latter would be devastating for non-profit organizations.  Upper income taxpayers are the backbone of charitable giving.  If charities are expected to carry more of the social service costs during tough times, why cut their major source of giving?  If this pattern of penalizing the rich continues, expect America’s wealthy to move their assets to offshore tax havens and more taxpayers will create trusts to escape taxation altogether thus reducing rather than increasing tax revenues.

The litany of misdirected tactics goes on and on!  Another bank or industry bailout is just a waste of your money and mine. The Federal government is already the de-facto banking industry in this country given all the money invested in the industry and the widespread guarantees of deposits. Recovery of this recession was always going to take a long period of time until the consumer got his balance sheet back into creditworthy condition thus allowing him to “get back into the game”.  These bailout and stimulus programs are costly diversions from the underlying cure and they are now, along with the President’s ambitious spending budgets, creating concern among economists and international traders about the future creditworthiness of the U.S. government. We warned about this possibility in our website article of Sept. 8, 2008, “Stocks, Recession and the Bailout”.  Apparently we are not alone.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC