The Fed, Consumer Confidence and Toyota; Bad News All Around

Morris Segall      business landscape, Consumer Confidence, consumers, economics, economy, government, The Fed, Toyota

Beginning with last week’s sudden increase in the discount rate by the Fed, the expanding product scandal at Toyota and Tuesday’s surprising decline in the consumer confidence index from the Conference Board, the news has been bad for the economy and bad for the equity markets.

While the increase in the discount rate was no surprise, given Chairman Bernanke’s prior comments signalling such a move was likely, the timing and manner of the increase was quite surprising and unsettling. For months the Fed and Chairman Bernanke have stated the economy was still quite fragile despite its recovery. Public statements repeatedly reaffirmed the highly accommodative Fed policy of low interest rates. So why did the Fed not wait for its March Board of Governors meeting to announce its increase in the Fed funds rate?  Why did the Fed wait until the stock and bond markets were closed last Thursday to make its announcement?  These actions have been uncharacteristic of Fed actions which have emphasized transparency. We believe the Fed action is another in a series of moves toward normalization of monetary policy and an effort to drain excess liquidity from the financial system. But we believe the nature of the Fed action was aimed more toward foreign investors than for domestic consumption. We believe the continuing rumblings of overseas discontent with current American monetary policy and the revelation of significant sales of U.S. Treasury holdings by China created enough unease in Washington to send a signal to foreign investors that the Fed was ready to move on excess liquidity concerns. Keep in mind the current backdrop of increasing sovereign debt risk in Europe and the Middle East. The rising concerns over the increasing national debt and credit ratings of the U.S. government and the ongoing auctions of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds that are running on average at $100 billion per month. If the Fed action was precipitated by foreign concerns, monetary policy may not be as dependent on the fragile state of the U.S. economy as the Fed has stated.

The unraveling of the Toyota product image as more and more product defects surface and the company’s response becomes more suspect will hurt Toyota manufacturing and sales in the U.S.  Of course this will benefit Ford and GM but the manufacturing, parts supplier and dealer networks of Toyota in the U.S. are important contributors to the U.S. economy and are not fully replicated by domestic manufacturers, particularly given the downsizing of Detroit in the recession. Toyota imports are important economic contributors to West Coast ports and domestic rail and truck volumes. The problems of Toyota are an important reminder of the vulnerability of brand image and customer brand loyalty and how vigilant company managements must be to maintain them. This will be a textbook case taught in business schools of how not to handle quality control and customer relations issues.

Tuesday’s unexpected steep decline in the Conference Board’s consumer confidence index for February is very disturbing.  After showing improvement as the economy recovered and the stock market moved higher the Conference Board index plunged to a reading of 46 from a level of 56.5 in January. The steep decline in the third quarter of economic recovery is not at all typical.  The reading of 46 is consistent with the low levels recorded in the depths of the recession last year.  More distubing are the subsector readings within the index.  The measure of responses indicating positive sentiment to  current conditions was less than 20%, a 27 year low. Almost 50% of respondents felt jobs were hard to get versus less than 5% of respondents who felt jobs were easy to get. Over 45% of respondents felt business conditions were poor. Sentiment readings on the near term outlook also fell significantly from January levels. In short, consumers are depressed currently due to ongoing unemployment and consumer income pressures and discouraged about meaningful improvement in the near term. This level of pessimism can be self fulfilling and act as depressants to consumer spending which must improve if the current economic recovery is to be sustained and expanded.

All of this will not be lost on the stock and commodity markets as witnessed by Tuesday’s declines.  Unless news from the consumer sector reverses, the equity and commodity markets will be hard pressed to rally further from current levels in the near term. Conversely, strong corporate earnings and a steady improvement in the manufacturing sector are providing support to the markets. We still believe the markets are vulnerable to correction in the near term but remain positive on equities and commodities intermediate-longer term. The signals coming from the Fed herald the end of zero interest rates and augur ill for the fixed income markets, particularly at the short end of the maturity spectrum.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Today’s Economic Landscape and What’s on the Other Side – Significant Economic Presentation

Morris Segall      2009 economy, Add new tag, business landscape, Capital Markets, consumers, crisis, debt

We recently updated our presentation on today’s economic landscape and what’s on the other side with some fresh data.  We hope you continue to find value in our slides:

January Unemployment: Are we there yet?

Morris Segall      business landscape, consumers, economic improvement, economics, economy, GDP, government, January Unemployment, Labor Department, politics, U.S. Census

Today’s unemployment report for the month of January was revealing for what it did not tell us. That is, are we about to turn the corner on unemployment ?  The report showed a modest 20,000 loss in jobs in the month of January,  a virtual flat performance with the month of December, 2009. Of more note was a .3% drop in the stated unemployment rate from 10% to 9.7%, the lowest rate since last summer. However, as we commented in our blog article, “November Unemployment: Is this the Peak?“, December 4, 2009, the Labor Department made annual revisions to its monthly employment reports. As expected, the revisions show more job losses in 2009 than previously reported. According to the revised calculations, the economy lost over 600,000 more jobs in calendar 2009 than previously reported including a large downward revision of 65,000 lost jobs in the month of December, 2009 to a revised total of 150,000 lost jobs in that month. So a flat January job loss result with December is not a job improvement. We therefore are skeptical of the drop in the unemployment rate. In addition, the average workweek in January remains depressed at 33.9 hours and the civilian labor force participation rate in January continued to reflect historical lows below 65%. There are other important items in the January employment report. Goods producing industries, largely in construction, lost another 60,000 jobs bringing the total for the last three months to almost 150,000. Financial activities and transportation and warehousing sectors lost another 35,000 jobs in January on top of the almost 29,000 jobs lost in December. These are generally high wage jobs.  Finally, long term unemployed, those out of work 27 weeks and longer, continue to rise to a record 6.3 million in January. This is the chronic problem in the unemployment picture. While new job losses continue to diminish, continuing job losses continue to rise.  The increasing universe of long term unemployed will continue to suppress consumer spending and therefore an acceleration in the economic recovery.

The January unemployment report did contain some positives. The number of temporary help workers increased by another 50,000 in January and since September by nearly 250,000. While this number is being augmented by hiring for the U.S. Census this year, the recent five month trend augurs well for ultimate permanent job creation later this year. For the first time since the recession began, manufacturing added jobs in January, albeit a small number (11,000), but it is significant and supports the economic improvement in the factory sector which we noted in our recent “Economic and Capital Market Update“, February 1, 2010 on our website. We expect further improvement in manufacturing employment reflecting the upside momentum in factory orders, particularly in the technology sector.

All in all, the January monthly unemployment report while encouraging is still not conclusive evidence of a transition to meaningful job creation in the current economic recovery.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC