We recently updated our presentation on today’s economic landscape and what’s on the other side with some fresh data. We hope you continue to find value in our slides:
Today’s unemployment data for November was a surprising loss of only 11,000 jobs, well below economists’ expectations of 100,000-150,000 jobs lost in the month. In addition, the unemployment rate for November declined unexpectedly to 10% from October’s 10.2%. Consensus expectations were for the unemployment rate in November to be flat at best with October’s cycle high. The Labor Dept. also revised downward previously reported job losses in September and October. Monthly job losses have been revised downward for each month since August by a total of over 200,000 jobs. Since August, monthly job losses have averaged below 200,000 versus over 300,000 average monthly losses in the May-July period. The decline in monthly job losses parallels the strong improvement in first time unemployment claims reported weekly. Since mid September, first time unemployment claims have fallen approximately 100,000 and are now running at approximately 450,000 for the last two weeks in November.
In isolating the areas of reduced job losses we note that healthcare continues to be the area of the economy that has consistently added workers during the recession. Since September, healthcare has added an additional 100,000 workers and nearly 900,000 workers since the recession began in December of 2007. Other areas of job improvement since September are: the federal government and state government education accounting for an increase in approximately 50,000 jobs; and professional and business services adding over 100,000 jobs largely in temporary help services. Importantly, for the first time this year, the average workweek increased to 33.2 hours from a cycle low of 33.0 hours in October. The average workweek improved more in the manufacturing sector expanding to 40.4 hours from 40.0 hours in September. This reflects the recurring order and shipment strength in the manufacturing sector since last summer.
Conversely, most other areas of the economy continued to record job losses including manufacturing, finance, construction, retail and wholesale trade and information services. While the Labor Dept. reports almost 41% of reporting industries are now hiring, a cycle high, that leaves nearly 60% that are not. The surge in temporary help jobs indicates businesses are wary of the economic recovery and are reticent to add to payrolls. Furthermore, the labor force has declined by over 100,000 workers since September indicating an increase in discouraged workers despite the improvement in the economy. The decline in the civilian labor force would also partly explain the decline in the unemployment rate in November. Another benchmark of employment in the weekly and monthly reports indicate no improvement in the numbers of long term unemployed and under-employed workers. In fact, the numbers of long term unemployed increased to over 9 million or 38% of total unemployed at the end of November, a record level. In addition, while first time unemployment claims have declined sharply, they are still recording well above 400,000 claims per week. Finally, the response from consumers in recent surveys indicate jobs are hard to get by an overwhelming margin despite the economic improvement in the third and fourth quarters. These measures do not support the monthly improvement in employment reported by the Labor Dept. since August and we have repeatedly said so in our blog articles on the monthly employment reports going back to last July.
Nonetheless, if the monthly employment report from the Labor Dept. is indeed true and not distorted by seasonal adjustments and faulty assumptions that are part of this survey’s results, then it would appear that unemployment in this cycle is peaking and job creation is virtually around the corner early next year. This would be well ahead of consensus expectations, including our own, in projecting a peak in unemployment and the transition to job creation in the middle and latter part of 2010, respectively. It is important to note that the Labor Dept. will be making final revisions to its 2009 monthly employment data in March of 2010. In its initial revision to 2009 monthly employment data in August, the Labor Dept. revealed that unemployment this year was actually almost 900,000 workers higher than originally reported. Similar revisions were made to monthly data in 2007 and 2008. With that as a background and the contradictory results of other unemployment data and surveys, we are skeptical the employment cycle is turning this strongly and this fast.
Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC
Friday’s monthly employment report for September was bad. September job losses, per the Business Establishment series, was a -263,000, worse than analysts projected. Job losses were widespread between manufacturing, construction and a huge 147,000 loss in service sector jobs. The stated unemployment rate increased to 9.8%, another record level. The unofficial unemployment rate that includes underemployed and discouraged workers rose to 17%. The average workweek declined to a record low 33 hours and the employment to population ratio declined to a record low of 58.8%. That means less than 60% of the available working age population are employed in full time jobs. Unemployment rates increased in all demographic groups led by teenagers at a crushing 26% and minority groups in the low to mid teens. The unemployment rate for adult men escalated to over 10%. While these numbers have chronic economic implications they also have negative social impact as well and we are seeing it in an increase in crime, divorce, domestic violence and physical and psychological disorders. We wrote about the social and emotional toll of this recession in our website article of March 23rd, “ I am Mad as Hell…“. The scars from this growing and continued high level of unemployment will be felt long after the economy recovers.
As if the current level of unemployment were not distressing enough, the Labor Dept. announced that a preliminary estimate of its annual benchmark revision to the monthly unemployment data shows that private sector employment going back to March of this year is lower than originally reported by 855,000 jobs. In a previous blog article, “The July Employment Report…“, August 10, 2009, we stated that we believed recent monthly unemployment numbers would be revised downward when the annual revisions are made next March. The 855,000 increase in lost jobs is a PRELIMINARY estimate and we are expecting it to go higher when the final revisions are made next year.
Friday’s unemployment data on the heels of Thursday’s increase in first time unemployment claims is the latest in a string of weakening economic data last week. We stated in our last blog article, “The Economy, Capital Markets…“, October 1, 2009, that we are getting “uneasy about the underlying improvement in the economy”. Friday’s unemployment report is more unsettling and increases our unease.
To be sure we need to see more economic data for the month of September before making revisions to our economic and capital market outlooks. However, we are advising our capital markets clients to take some capital gains where tax considerations are not an issue and hold onto cash as a defensive measure. We still believe there was enough “pop” in the government stimulated economy in the third quarter to generate 3%+ GDP growth. But we are increasingly unsure about subsequent quarters as government stimulus wanes. If our fears are realized, equity markets here and abroad have considerable downside risk from current levels. As we have stated repeatedly in previous blog and website articles, there is no recovery without the consumer moving “goods off the shelves” on a continuing basis. Worsening levels of unemployment just keep postponing that development. Investors and businesses will need to be flexible and nimble in planning for next year. Stay tuned as we continue to analyze data and events over the remainder of this year.
Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC
On Friday, the Labor Department reported the monthly employment situation report for the month of July. The Establishment Survey, the one most widely used as the benchmark for measuring monthly job creation showed nonfarm payroll employment declined by 247,000 in the month of July, a number better than widely held forecasts. It is the lowest level of monthly job losses since last August before the massive economic declines in the fourth quarter of last year and the first quarter of this year. It is also two thirds lower than the peak level of monthly job losses recorded in January of this year at over 740,000. With a number this low, naturally job losses in most major industry sectors measured by the survey saw significant declines in job losses from the surprisingly weak June levels. The exception was retail trade which saw job losses in this category double from 21,000 in June to 44,000 in July reflecting the continued poor consumer spending environment. Nonetheless, economists and financial commentators viewed the dramatic improvement in the monthly numbers as further evidence of the recession’s end and imminent economic recovery. To be sure, we concur the huge decline in monthly job losses reported since March’s 652,000 follows the general trend in first time unemployment claims which peaked at 674,000 in late March and has declined to 550,000 as of August 1st and signifies a peaking in new job destruction in this cycle and fortifies other economic data suggesting the recession has bottomed.
However, as we have written in previous posts, “Current Economic News Needs a Dose of Reality“, May 15th, 2009, the dramatically improved job loss numbers in the government’s Establishment Survey continues to be at odds with other government employment reports and empirical data we are getting from job seekers and businesses. Inconsistencies include:
1. While job losses in July measured 247,000 and a 9.4% unemployment rate, the civilian labor force saw over 400,000 people leave it in July versus June and over 570,000 since May. The civilian labor force participation rate in July fell to 65.5%, matching the lowest level of worker participation in this cycle in March of this year.
2. While monthly job losses per the Establishment Survey have declined from 652,000 in March to 247,000 in July, first time unemployment claims, representing new job layoffs, have declined from 674,000 to 550,000 over the same period. A figure twice as high as the establishment survey estimate.
3. The number of unemployed workers including discouraged workers and part time workers who cannot get full time employment continued to increase in July. The number of people leaving or not in the work force increased substantially (over 1 million people) in July reflecting discouragement with finding gainful employment. This is consistent with the empirical information we hear from job seekers who say jobs are very hard to land and employers who tell us they are still not hiring and will have to lay off more workers if sales do not pick up.
4. The average work week increased by .1% to 33.1, the second lowest work week during the entire recession. We will see if the recent three month trend of monthly job losses per the Establishment Survey of approximately 330,000 is accurate. We continue to believe these recent numbers are vulnerable to downward revision when the Labor
Department makes it annual benchmark revisions next March. For now, the consensus is taking the numbers at face value.
There was another very important economic announcement on Friday. The Federal Reserve released its report on Consumer Credit for the month of June and for the fourth consecutive quarter, consumer credit declined. Consumer credit contracted at nearly a 5% annual rate in June, nearly double the 2.6% annual rate of decline in May. Since its peak in the third quarter of 2008, consumer credit outstanding has declined 3% or over $75 billion at the end of June, 2009. Most of this decline has occurred in revolving credit, i.e. credit cards. Since the third quarter of 2008, revolving credit has declined 6% or over $55 billion. Clearly consumers are continuing to pay down their debt in an attempt to de-leverage their balance sheets. Combined with a continued high savings rate in excess of 4% at the end of the second quarter, it is clear American consumers are paying down debt and increasing their liquidity. These trends and the existing high levels of unemployment continue to suppress consumer spending.
The government is artificially creating increased consumer spending and retail sales via its “Cash for Clunkers” program and the other stimulus package spending that will be impacting the economy over the next four quarters. However without job creation rather than “less worse” job destruction, a sustained consumer led spending increase is unlikely. In fact, to the extent the government creates consumer spending near term, it could result in deflated consumer spending longer term when the government stimulus ends. The key to a real economic recovery continues to be the revival and return of the consumer, with a job and the financial capacity and creditworthiness to spend. The consumer led us into the recession. He will have to lead us out. Recovery in this cycle was always going to be a long stretch in re-liquifying and de-leveraging the consumer so he could “get back in the game”. He is doing just that but the loss of his job is making those tasks longer and more difficult. While these trends hurt the economy in the short term, they will help sustain the recovery in the longer term.
Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC
In our July 5th blog entry, “June Employment Report–Green Shoots Fading“, we commented that a doubtful economic recovery expected in the third quarter and pessimistic earnings guidance from companies reporting second quarter earnings this month would in our opinion herald stock market corrections here and abroad near term. Since that posting the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined approximately 5% in the ensuing five trading sessions before rebounding on expectations of robust bank earnings to be reported this week. Indeed, Goldman Sachs reported a “blowout” quarter led by its investment banking activities. However the more significant earning news yesterday came from Intel that reported a surprisingly strong second quarter highlighted by a surge in revenues and unexpected expansion in gross margins from increased unit volumes of consumer products. Even more importantly, the company reestablished earnings guidance for the remainder of the current fiscal year as the outlook for its business became more visible and positive. This is the kind of earnings encouragement that is necessary to sustain the market recovery begun last March. To be sure, Intel’s business turn may be truly singular to itself and not indicative of a broader upturn in the technology sector but as a bellwhether in the industry and in the major market averages, the substantial improvement in Intel’s performance and outlook lead us to believe we are at or near the bottom of the earnings cycle for non-financial companies. Indeed, we feel Intel’s results signal the same kind of shift in corporate earnings we saw at the opposite end of the spectrum in early 2008 when we wrote our article, “GE, the Earnings Cycle and Food”, April 14, 2008. In that article, we noted the deterioration in GE’s first quarter 2008 earnings and the very negative implications for the rest of S & P 500 corporate earnings last year.
The Intel results reflect successful new product introductions, stringent cost control, inventory reduction and strong sales. The strong sales reflect strong demand for PC products from China and the U.S. aided in the latter by bargain selling prices by the company’s resellers and buying stimulus from accelerated write-offs offered by the Federal government. The higher sales volume and cost reductions allowed the company to record much expanded gross margins in the quarter despite lower average selling prices and lower unit margins on consumer products. This has been a theme of ours supporting a positive outlook for common stocks led higher by rapidly increasing corporate profits from increased gross margins from increased unit sales volume.
The new, improved visibility for increased unit sales, continued cost controls and tight inventory control is allowing the company to forecast improved gross margins for both the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year which may force analyst earnings forecasts to be raised. This is also reinforcing another of our themes for the recovery cycle, namely the pent up demand for computers that can only be deferred for so long before a new sales cycle begins. Currently, the new demand is coming in consumer products but the company expects business demand to pick up next year for the same reasons. Importantly, the higher end business products carry higher unit margins which should amplify Intel’s earnings when the economy recovers.
Thus, we are encouraged that the Intel earnings report contains the seeds of a bottoming in earnings in the technology sector and possibly other areas of Producers Durable Equipment sector, i.e. capital goods as pent up demand, bargain purchase prices, accelerated equipment write-offs and fast return on investment and increased productivity lead to a recovery in this sector. We expected this sector to be a leading element in the economic recovery forecasted for next year due to short lead times for purchase and profitable returns. The Intel earnings report and new guidance give us reason to believe in that forecast. And yet we still believe in our comments of July 5th that many companies will not have the positive guidance outlooks of Intel, i.e. consumer discretionary, real estate, transportation to name a few. In view of this and the continued weak near term economic environment, we still believe the capital markets are vulnerable near term to the downside as economic and corporate earnings remain weak. Neverthless, our intermediate and longer term outlooks are reinforced by the Intel results.
Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC
We recently updated our presentation on today’s economic landscape and what’s on the other side with some fresh data. We hope you continue to find value in our slides:
This week the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index for the month of May came in at an impressive 54.9, a surprisingly strong increase over the rise in the index in the month of April. The strong increases in the Conference Board’s and Michigan Consumer Sentiment Surveys in April and May we believe are largely due to the continued strong gains in U.S. stock prices since mid March.
Indeed, we mentioned in our Economic Update of May 1, 2009 that the March reading in this index in the mid 30s would likely be the low point for consumer sentiment in the current cycle. The news of the cycle results and its attribution to perceived improved labor conditions, mentioned in the survey, were the catalysts for the recent strong stock market rally.
What Does it REALLY Mean?
There has always been a strong correlation between strong stock markets and rising levels of consumer sentiment. We, along with many other market analysts, are skeptical of the intermediate and long term predictive value of consumer sentiment surveys. One of the unexpected measurements of strength in the survey was a perceived improvement in job availability among consumers to 44.7 from 46.6. Such a slight statistical improvement is not a convincing improvement in trend particularly when one notes the absolute high level (approximately 45%) of respondents reporting “jobs are hard to get” versus the level of approximately 6% reporting “jobs are plentiful”.
We stated further in our May 1 Economic Update that consumer sentiment surveys can be fickle and inaccurate as a predictor of actual consumer spending trends. To be sure, we believe the just concluded Memorial Day holiday will show a strong increase in consumer spending as more Americans hit the road for vacation travel. We are expecting strong retail spending numbers for the first holiday weekend of summer. Our concern is that the current depressed economic environment may become one of a “sawtooth” pattern of economic activities. One month of increased retail sales and factory orders and industrial production followed by a retrenchment due to the continued high levels of unemployment and weak consumer and business demand.
In short, we do not believe there is sufficient strength in consumer finances and psychology to sustain a consistent rise in consumer spending in the near term.
Take a Look at the Hard News
Conversely, the news coming into the Memorial Day holiday was far more disturbing for the following reasons:
1. Rising Interest Rates
The yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury Note rose on Friday to nearly 3.5%, up from 3.17% since the middle of May and 2.53% since the middle of March. This is the highest yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury securities since last November. We have warned in previous blog and website articles the massive negative impact on longer term U.S. economic growth from rising interest rates and a large decline in the U.S. Dollar. Both of these developments are occurring now despite the action of the FED to buy Treasures to keep interest rates low.
2. Federal Budget Deficits
Coincident with the dramatic rise in intermediate and long term U.S. Treasury interest rates have been equally dramatic increases in the projected Federal budget deficits for fiscal 2009 and 2010 and the chronic increase in the government’s national debt. This deterioration in the U.S. financial condition is causing alarm among national and world investors, including foreign governments and world banking institutions that the U.S. credit rating would be downgraded like that of Great Britain last week.
3. Credit Crunch on Farmers
Deteriorating credit availability for farmers which may affect the procurement of fertilizer, seeds, animal feed and farm equipment. The credit crunch on farmers could negatively impact upcoming harvests and thus cause a rise in food prices next winter.
4. The State of California
The continuing chronic fiscal woes of the State of California whose budget deficits are projected to rise to more than $40 billion in fiscal 2010. We fear the Federal government will have to bail out the state within the next two-three years to avert a major state default and cutbacks to state services that would be injurious to the public wellbeing. A federal “bailout” of California would rank among the largest and most expensive and long lasting in this current financial crisis. It would certainly add to the deterioration of the Federal balance sheet and pressure our credit rating and currency. It would also lead to further demands from severely depressed states for increased Federal assistance.
Reality Check
We continue to be wary of over-exuberant stock market reactions to encouraging news du jour which needs to be confirmed by improved and sustained underlying improvement in unemployment, a bottoming in residential housing and a peaking in bank loan losses.
Until we see that, we maintain that we have hit a DEMAND bottom at the end of the first quarter but not a recession bottom. The second and third quarters of this year will be “less worse” than the first but not an end to the recession. We might see some slight improvement in GDP in this year’s fourth quarter but more likely we will have to wait until 2010 for gradual economic recovery. Bullish reactions to this week’s economic news is premature.
In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies. Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.
In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series. Part two discussed the first four trends and developments. Part three discussed public anger. Part four discussed the declining economy causes spiraling stress. Part five discussed the long-term implications for the recession. And now we will wrap up this series with some concluding thoughts:
We expect the U.S. recession to end later this year and gradually begin recovery next year and accelerate through 2011, 2012 and 2013. The U.S. recovery will stimulate the export dependent economies overseas and they will recover accordingly.
After a strong cyclical recovery, the U.S. will settle into a stagflationary economic cycle characterized by a secular high level of unemployment, lower worker productivity, a resumption of higher energy, food and commodity inflation and slower consumer income growth and spending.
High deficits, increased entitlement spending, increased interest rates and a depreciated currency will deteriorate U.S. government finances.
Emerging markets overseas in Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America will again pace future long-term economic growth.
Americans will shift politically to the left as they become more dependent on government spending for basic needs and income.
Populations in mature industrialized economies will shift politically to the right as they become more nationalistic to protect jobs, companies and existing social welfare programs. They will also be less inclined to pursue free trade in the future.
Free trade will still be important to emerging industrialized economies as they continue to pursue export oriented economic growth and employment. This will increase tensions between the mature economies such as Western Europe, Japan and the U.S. and the emerging economies of Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe.
From a capital markets standpoint, we remain defensive in the short term as we look for evidence of an economic bottoming. However, we would prepare to emphasize common stocks, particularly large cap and NASDAQ U.S. stocks to participate in a bottoming in the recession and subsequent economic recoveries here and abroad. We would also increase our positions in gold and other commodities as the world economies reflate and commodity prices increase. Concomitantly, we would avoid bonds as they will see a shift in cash to stocks and an increase in interest rates in an economic recovery. Please contact us with any questions regarding this article and for specific recommendations on your investment program.
SPG Trend Advisors is a boutique consultancy that provides global economic research for business and other decision makers. With fifty years combined experience between the principals, and through its website, SPG Trend Advisors provides insightful analysis and forecasting to prepare senior executives for tomorrows trends. Visit SPGTrend.com for more information.
