August Employment: There is None

Morris Segall      Capital Markets, consumer sentiment, Economic stagnation, economy, employment, employment report, future trends, government, government stimulus, manufacturing, private sector investment, recession, slowdown, unemployment

Today’s employment report for August continued a worsening trend in the job market we have noted in our blog and website articles since June. Rather than another month of paltry job growth seen since May, job creation in August was zero. The last time the monthly employment report recorded an absence of job creation was last September. In addition, job creation for the months of June and July were revised downward a combined 58,000 jobs. Thus, over the last three months, job creation has averaged 35,000 jobs versus an average of 153,000 over the first five months of this year. Even the private sector, which has been creating a moderate level of jobs so far this year, dropped to nearly zero in job creation in August. More distressing is the event we have feared since the economy and employment faded through the second quarter. That is the shift by employers from reduced job hiring to job layoffs. In the August report, a number of industries recorded job losses including: manufacturing; construction; retail trade; transportation and information technology. The latter includes striking Verizon employees but that does not account for all of the job loss in this sector. The government sector also shed another 17,000 jobs in August. Year to date, the government sector has reduced employment by over 260,000 jobs.

As bad as these numbers are, other data in the employment report for August are even more negative. The already weak average workweek declined to 34.2 hours from 34.3 hours in June and July and is at the low level of last August. Average hourly earnings declined from July levels and are less that 2% above year ago levels, well below nominal inflation. The number of involuntary part time workers increased by approximately 400,000 to over 8.8 million workers from July and is at the highest level since last August. As we reported in prior employment report articles, the number of unemployed 5-14 weeks had been expanding in recent months. Now those people are unemployed over 15 weeks and that category has expanded to almost 59% of the number of unemployed persons.

Combined with the very weak manufacturing data reported yesterday showing major declines in orders, shipments, backlogs and employment and the plummeting levels of consumer confidence in recent surveys, and we have an economy that is “stalled out” and on the verge of sliding back into recession. We have previously cautioned about such a prospect in previous blog articles if economic data over the summer did not improve materially and fast. It hasn’t.

The private sector is doing what we expected in a weakening economic environment-cutting back. The President is expected to announce new economic stimulus measures next week to help create jobs. They will not turn the economy around. The Fed will inaugurate a QE3 program to add more liquidity if recession is imminent. The impact will be similar to that of QE2- a temporary respite but damaging to the bond market and the value of the U.S. Dollar. Without the full participation of the private sector to invest heavily into the economy and hire workers, the current economic trends and pessimistic outlook will not change. This also does not augur well for U.S. and overseas capital markets.

Morris R. Segall

May Manufacturing: Pause or Peak

Morris Segall      consumer spending, Economic Growth, economic recovery, economy, manufacturing, slowdown, stock market, trends

The ISM national manufacturing survey for May fell precipitously from April levels, confirming the trend seen in regional manufacturing surveys released over the past two weeks. For a number of reasons, the economy, including manufacturing, is slowing as we proceed into the second quarter. This looks very much like the pattern in economic activity we experienced last year as economic growth peaked last March-April and receded over the summer before reviving in the fall and winter. The reasons for the slowdown this year are primarily related to the surge in inflation since last summer, led by huge jumps in food and energy prices. This has been a restraining factor on consumer discretionary spending and has put pressure on corporate profit margins. It appears the rising level of prices is causing businesses to reduce spending to a greater extent than consumers as the experience of the recent recession has taught businesses to move quickly to cut spending to protect profitability.

Another factor hurting manufacturing currently is the dislocation of orders and shipments from and to Japan as a result of the earthquake and tsunami that has devastated that nation and created havoc with its industrial production and shipments.

In addition, the contraction in economic growth in Europe and ongoing sovereign debt issues are suppressing exports to the weaker economies in the Euro zone.

The unrest in the Middle East and North Africa has dislocated business orders and shipments from that region.

Lastly, the huge decline in shipments reported in the regional and national manufacturing surveys in May, reinforce our belief that a significant factor in May’s manufacturing weakness is due to the severe storms experienced in April and May in the Eastern U.S. and particularly the Midwest. In all of the manufacturing surveys production measures experience some of the biggest declines in the month of May.

It is noteworthy that the category of “No Change” increased significantly in many of the regional and national surveys in May. The increase in this category in May raised the absolute readings in this category to levels that far overshadowed the levels of weakening responses in the surveys. We interpret this that more of the weakness in these manufacturing diffusion indices is due to a “flattening” in the key metrics rather than massive deterioration. In addition, employment in virtually all of the manufacturing surveys remained positive. We acknowledge that employment is a lagging indicator and further weakening in orders, shipments and backlogs will result in weakening trends in employment going forward. Surprisingly, in many of the manufacturing surveys, including the national, respondents were generally positive regarding the future and expected key trends in orders and shipments to improve from May levels. If we are correct in our assessment of the impact of weather on the May surveys, we would concur. Finally, it should be noted that in the national survey, 14 of 18 industries reported growth in May with only 3 industries reporting contraction and those three industries were not major capital goods sectors.

It remains to be seen if the manufacturing growth trends rebound in June and beyond. If so, the capital investment cycle that has led the economic recovery will remain intact. If not, and the May surveys are signaling a weakening trend, then we will have to face the possibility this cycle may have peaked.

We are not optimistic that if such is the case, the federal government will resuscitate it with further stimulus as it did last year. The absence of further strong growth in manufacturing will lead to reduced overall economic growth this year and into next. Because of the flagging growth in manufacturing and net exports so far this quarter, we will be re-evaluating our economic growth projections for the second quarter and the rest of this year. We will evaluate the May employment report before we make our revisions.

The weakness in the May manufacturing report along with a forecast of weak employment growth by the independent payroll processing firm, ADP, caused a major sell-off in the U.S. equity markets on Wednesday that is being replicated by Asian markets Thursday morning and likely will spread to Europe. The world capital markets are nervous about the outlook for world economic growth and financial stability and have become very volatile. Those outlooks will dim further if the U.S. economic recovery stalls out. This is why we have emphasized private equity and the investment themes of merger and acquisition, infrastructure investment and business growth financing in our capital market strategy for the intermediate and longer term (See our website article of January 6, 2011 and our website Economic and Capital Market Presentation of February 2, 2011). Recent events overseas and the fragility of our own economic recovery plus our long term financial difficulties, reinforce this strategy.

Morris R. Segall

The Fed, Consumer Confidence and Toyota; Bad News All Around

Morris Segall      business landscape, Consumer Confidence, consumers, economics, economy, government, The Fed, Toyota

Beginning with last week’s sudden increase in the discount rate by the Fed, the expanding product scandal at Toyota and Tuesday’s surprising decline in the consumer confidence index from the Conference Board, the news has been bad for the economy and bad for the equity markets.

While the increase in the discount rate was no surprise, given Chairman Bernanke’s prior comments signalling such a move was likely, the timing and manner of the increase was quite surprising and unsettling. For months the Fed and Chairman Bernanke have stated the economy was still quite fragile despite its recovery. Public statements repeatedly reaffirmed the highly accommodative Fed policy of low interest rates. So why did the Fed not wait for its March Board of Governors meeting to announce its increase in the Fed funds rate?  Why did the Fed wait until the stock and bond markets were closed last Thursday to make its announcement?  These actions have been uncharacteristic of Fed actions which have emphasized transparency. We believe the Fed action is another in a series of moves toward normalization of monetary policy and an effort to drain excess liquidity from the financial system. But we believe the nature of the Fed action was aimed more toward foreign investors than for domestic consumption. We believe the continuing rumblings of overseas discontent with current American monetary policy and the revelation of significant sales of U.S. Treasury holdings by China created enough unease in Washington to send a signal to foreign investors that the Fed was ready to move on excess liquidity concerns. Keep in mind the current backdrop of increasing sovereign debt risk in Europe and the Middle East. The rising concerns over the increasing national debt and credit ratings of the U.S. government and the ongoing auctions of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds that are running on average at $100 billion per month. If the Fed action was precipitated by foreign concerns, monetary policy may not be as dependent on the fragile state of the U.S. economy as the Fed has stated.

The unraveling of the Toyota product image as more and more product defects surface and the company’s response becomes more suspect will hurt Toyota manufacturing and sales in the U.S.  Of course this will benefit Ford and GM but the manufacturing, parts supplier and dealer networks of Toyota in the U.S. are important contributors to the U.S. economy and are not fully replicated by domestic manufacturers, particularly given the downsizing of Detroit in the recession. Toyota imports are important economic contributors to West Coast ports and domestic rail and truck volumes. The problems of Toyota are an important reminder of the vulnerability of brand image and customer brand loyalty and how vigilant company managements must be to maintain them. This will be a textbook case taught in business schools of how not to handle quality control and customer relations issues.

Tuesday’s unexpected steep decline in the Conference Board’s consumer confidence index for February is very disturbing.  After showing improvement as the economy recovered and the stock market moved higher the Conference Board index plunged to a reading of 46 from a level of 56.5 in January. The steep decline in the third quarter of economic recovery is not at all typical.  The reading of 46 is consistent with the low levels recorded in the depths of the recession last year.  More distubing are the subsector readings within the index.  The measure of responses indicating positive sentiment to  current conditions was less than 20%, a 27 year low. Almost 50% of respondents felt jobs were hard to get versus less than 5% of respondents who felt jobs were easy to get. Over 45% of respondents felt business conditions were poor. Sentiment readings on the near term outlook also fell significantly from January levels. In short, consumers are depressed currently due to ongoing unemployment and consumer income pressures and discouraged about meaningful improvement in the near term. This level of pessimism can be self fulfilling and act as depressants to consumer spending which must improve if the current economic recovery is to be sustained and expanded.

All of this will not be lost on the stock and commodity markets as witnessed by Tuesday’s declines.  Unless news from the consumer sector reverses, the equity and commodity markets will be hard pressed to rally further from current levels in the near term. Conversely, strong corporate earnings and a steady improvement in the manufacturing sector are providing support to the markets. We still believe the markets are vulnerable to correction in the near term but remain positive on equities and commodities intermediate-longer term. The signals coming from the Fed herald the end of zero interest rates and augur ill for the fixed income markets, particularly at the short end of the maturity spectrum.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

January Unemployment: Are we there yet?

Morris Segall      business landscape, consumers, economic improvement, economics, economy, GDP, government, January Unemployment, Labor Department, politics, U.S. Census

Today’s unemployment report for the month of January was revealing for what it did not tell us. That is, are we about to turn the corner on unemployment ?  The report showed a modest 20,000 loss in jobs in the month of January,  a virtual flat performance with the month of December, 2009. Of more note was a .3% drop in the stated unemployment rate from 10% to 9.7%, the lowest rate since last summer. However, as we commented in our blog article, “November Unemployment: Is this the Peak?“, December 4, 2009, the Labor Department made annual revisions to its monthly employment reports. As expected, the revisions show more job losses in 2009 than previously reported. According to the revised calculations, the economy lost over 600,000 more jobs in calendar 2009 than previously reported including a large downward revision of 65,000 lost jobs in the month of December, 2009 to a revised total of 150,000 lost jobs in that month. So a flat January job loss result with December is not a job improvement. We therefore are skeptical of the drop in the unemployment rate. In addition, the average workweek in January remains depressed at 33.9 hours and the civilian labor force participation rate in January continued to reflect historical lows below 65%. There are other important items in the January employment report. Goods producing industries, largely in construction, lost another 60,000 jobs bringing the total for the last three months to almost 150,000. Financial activities and transportation and warehousing sectors lost another 35,000 jobs in January on top of the almost 29,000 jobs lost in December. These are generally high wage jobs.  Finally, long term unemployed, those out of work 27 weeks and longer, continue to rise to a record 6.3 million in January. This is the chronic problem in the unemployment picture. While new job losses continue to diminish, continuing job losses continue to rise.  The increasing universe of long term unemployed will continue to suppress consumer spending and therefore an acceleration in the economic recovery.

The January unemployment report did contain some positives. The number of temporary help workers increased by another 50,000 in January and since September by nearly 250,000. While this number is being augmented by hiring for the U.S. Census this year, the recent five month trend augurs well for ultimate permanent job creation later this year. For the first time since the recession began, manufacturing added jobs in January, albeit a small number (11,000), but it is significant and supports the economic improvement in the factory sector which we noted in our recent “Economic and Capital Market Update“, February 1, 2010 on our website. We expect further improvement in manufacturing employment reflecting the upside momentum in factory orders, particularly in the technology sector.

All in all, the January monthly unemployment report while encouraging is still not conclusive evidence of a transition to meaningful job creation in the current economic recovery.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Ben Bernanke, the Stock Market and the Economy

Morris Segall      Ben Bernanke, economy, employment report, GDP, government, stock market, trends, unemployment

After playing politics with Ben Bernanke’s nomination in the wake of last Tuesday’s election loss in Massachusetts, the Democrats with help from the stock market on Friday, thought better of their populist pandering on Monday and began to rally around the beleaguered Fed Chairman. Criticism began late Friday with the stock market selloff and built up over the weekend. In our blog article of December 8, 2009, “Ben Bernanke: Hero or Goat“, we warned of the market ramifications of politicizing the Fed and its Chairman’s reappointment process. Congress got the message over the weekend and will now probably vote to reappoint Ben Bernanke.

Friday’s stock market sell off culminated a week that saw the market decline over 500 points and erased the gains accrued in the first two weeks of the year. After rising virtually non stop since its lows in early March of last year, the stock market entered 2010 strectched and overdue for a correction. Last week’s market decline could be the beginning of such a correction. Despite good news on corporate earnings and sound fiscal action on the part of the Chinese government to curb speculation in their economy, stocks sold off reversing their pattern of seeing the “glass half full” on virtually all economic and corporate news. It remains to be seen if this new pattern of stock price decline will revert to the short lived selloffs of last year or develop into a long overdue correction. Such a correction would be good for the stock and commodity markets longer term. The latter have been particularly ebullient over the last year with outsized gains that are ripe for profit taking.

In a couple of days we will get our first look at the fourth quarter GDP. Consensus estimates are for growth of 4%-5%. In our blog article, “Third Quarter GDP Revised Down“, November 25, 2009, we stated “strong contributions in consumer spending and business fixed investment would be needed from downwardly revised third  quarter GDP levels”.  After watching numbers “see saw” in housing, unemployment and retail sales in the fourth quarter, we believe fourth quarter GDP will be within consensus estimates led by large gains in business fixed investment, notably machinery and equipment, and government spending with a solid contribution from personal consumption and a positive contribution from net exports. Since the third quarter of last year the manufacturing sector is the strongest part of the economy with factory orders and shipments maintaining their recovery from depressed recession levels. However, the strength in fourth quarter economic data is not expected to be sustained in the first quarter of this year. Post holiday retail and housing sales are expected to dip leaving economic growth to the government and industrial sectors. Economic growth is still dependent on government stimulus in the face of continued high levels of unemployment and the improvement in unemployment is still the key to sustained economic recovery. At this time we do not expect a “double dip” recession when government stimulus ends in the second half of this year but the visibility of economic growth is clouded by the stimulus programs which have distorted the normal trends of economic recovery and have resulted in a “sawtooth” pattern of economic data since the recession ended in the third quarter of last year. We expect that to continue until the private sector can sustain this recovery on its own.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Republicans win in Massachusetts: The vote heard “round the world”

Morris Segall      Democratic Party, democrats, economy, Election, government, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Senate, political, politics, President Obama, Republican Party, republicans, Scott Brown, Ted Kennedy

Tuesday’s  stunning victory in Massachusetts by Republican Scott Brown to fill the Senate seat of the late Ted Kennedy is undeniable evidence of the failure of the Democratic Party and President Obama to capitalize on their voter mandate in 2008. In what should have been a year of great accomplishment with passage of landmark legislation in healthcare, the environment and economic reform the President marks his inaugural anniversary with no great success in his domestic agenda and his party losing its super majority in the Senate. Coupled with recent Republican victories in gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia and the retirement of several leading Democrats in the Senate, the Democratic Party is firmly on the defensive with low voter approval ratings and the object of intense voter anger. We have been commenting on building voter anger in our website articles (See “Long Term Outlook“, October 8, 2006, “The Election“, November 17, 2008 and “I am Mad as Hell…”, March 23, 2009) and it has now reached a fever pitch exacerbated by the severe recession. We repeat the mantra we have stated since 2006, “an angry electorate is an unpredictable electorate”.  A more detailed review and analysis of the domestic political environment and its implications will be covered in an upcoming website article. For now, we make the following observations:

1. The President must take responsibility for his party’s decline and his program failures. The President is an eloquent speaker but he does not follow the speeches with forceful actions. We commented in our July and August blog articles on the failure of the President’s healthcare initiative BECAUSE of splits within the Democratic Party. With all of the political capital expended by the President on healthcare, his failure to unify his own party and rally public support on this issue have been fatal. The election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts and the decline in public approval have made the President’s healthcare initiative all but dead.

2. Likewise, the loss of the Massachusetts Senate seat will now slow if not halt the President’s initiatives on carbon taxation, immigration, financial system regulation and other major agenda items that encompass higher taxes and increased federal government presence.

3. The anger in the electorate and the failures of the President and the Democratic Party have now resurrected the Republican opposition and make them a credible threat to unseat Democrats in this year’s Congressional elections. Faced with public anger and reelection, Democrats in Congress will be less inclined to support the President. Significant losses by the Democrats in the House and Senate will likely result in legislative gridlock for the remainder of President Obama’s term. The President would increasingly look like a one term president. This will prevent solutions to the major socio-economic issues we face in the next decade and cloud our longer term economic outlook. This will however alleviate increased regulation of business and provide a more benign environment for the stock market in the shorter term.

4. This latest political setback for President Obama will not go unnoticed overseas. A president already viewed as weak and unsuccessful overseas (See our recent website article, “The Obama Foreign Policy“, January 7, 2010), will be weakened further if he cannot control his own political party and win the public debates on domestic policy.  It will be harder to get agreements from allies and concessions from adversaries particularly if the president looks like a one termer.

Tuesday’s Senate election in Massachusetts has altered the domestic political landscape and thus the economic outlook for the next two years. Its repercussions will be felt not only here in the U.S. but around the world as well.

Morris R. Segall

Ben Bernanke: Hero or Goat

Morris Segall      Ben Bernanke, business landscape, Capital Markets, credit crisis, economics, economy, government, obama, treasury, trends, unemployment

Ben Bernanke appears to be fighting for his life before Congress where several members from both major parties and one of the independents in the Senate are rejecting his reappointment as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board for a second four year term.  The opponents of his reappointment blame Mr. Bernanke for aiding and abetting the excesses in the financial system that resulted in its meltdown and taxpayer bailouts of many of its institutions. In their zeal to lash out at the stewards of fiscal and monetary policy during the financial crisis of the past two years, the critics of Ben Bernanke fail to include one of the most culpable parties to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and that is Congress itself. From the enactment of the Bank Holding Company Act in 1956 and its subsequent amendments which allowed banks to buy non bank financial entities outside of the supervision of the Federal Reserve System, to the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act which had separated the commercial and non-commercial banking activities of banks in 1999, to the lax oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, federally chartered institutions that were the backbone of mortgage securitizations and transactions which fed the lending bubble. For over 40 years the Congress has consistently enacted legislation that enabled banks and other lenders to engage in high risk activities OUTSIDE of the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. So when the Fed complained that it was losing control of the financial system, Congress did nothing.

In our website article of December 7, 2007, “The Treasury Plan: Is This the Solution?“  we outlined our skepticism of the success of the Treasury plan of then Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, to effectively “dance around” the mortgage crisis by adjusting mortgage rates and terms in the hope of forestalling the inevitable losses from mortgage defaults. It was not until March, 2008 that the Federal Reserve forcefully attacked the loan loss problem by swapping Treasury paper for the problem debt held by mortgage lenders. The Fed subsequently expanded Discount Window facilities to both commercial and for the fist time, non-commercial banks like investment banks and brokerage firms so these firms could have liquidity. In fact in our ongoing economic presentations such as the ones  posted on our blog and website,  there is an entire section of slides and commentary entitled “The Government”s Response” to the severe credit crisis. It shows the leadership of the Fed in increasing the money supply, reducing interest rates and expanding its own balance sheet by purchasing the “toxic” assets of the banking system to provide it with liquidity necessary to keep the system afloat.  By most objective scutiny of the Federal Government’s handling of the credit crisis, including our own jaundiced view, if there is a hero in this debacle, it is Ben Bernanke who literally pulled out all the stops to keep the financial system in this country from totally collapsing, particularly after Henry Paulson triggered a system panic by allowing Lehman Bros. to fail. We may not have liked the bailouts of many of these instituions but as we have stated in prior commentaries, the country runs on credit and letting the banking system fail was just not an option.

If one wants to point a finger at the Fed for allowing the credit bubble to build, it needs to be pointed at Alan Greenspan who instead of musing on the illogical low level of interest rates in 2004-05 in the face of the real estate boom should have raised interest rates and loan reserve and capital requirements to slow the creation of credit. Upon succeeding Greenspan in January, 2006 Ben Bernanke’ s Fed started raising interest rates through the spring and into the summer of that year and held those higher rates until the recession began in late 2007.

We and other observers believe Ben Bernanke will be reappointed to another term after this current thrashing. He better be. A rejection of Ben Bernanke AND an ill advised replacing of the Federal Reserve as the nation’s principal regulator of monetary policy and the financial system, would create a loss of confidence in foreign bankers, creditors and traders and would depress our bond markets and exacerbate an already “free falling” U.S. dollar. The President needs to show leadership on this issue and strongly reaffirm his support for the reappointment of Ben Bernanke and not let Congress make him the “goat” of the recession. If Congress wants to assess blame for the financial mess, they should begin by looking in the mirror.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

November Unemployment: Is this the Peak?

Morris Segall      consumers, debt, economic, economics, economy, employment report, GDP, government, recession, trends, unemployment

Today’s unemployment data for November was a surprising loss of only 11,000 jobs, well below economists’ expectations of 100,000-150,000 jobs lost in the month. In addition, the unemployment rate for November declined unexpectedly to 10% from October’s 10.2%. Consensus expectations were for the unemployment rate in November to be flat at best with October’s cycle high. The Labor Dept. also revised downward previously reported job losses in September and October. Monthly job losses have been revised downward for each month since August by a total of over 200,000 jobs. Since August, monthly job losses have averaged below 200,000 versus over 300,000 average monthly losses in the May-July period. The decline in monthly job losses parallels the strong improvement in first time unemployment claims reported weekly. Since mid September, first time unemployment claims have fallen approximately 100,000 and are now running at approximately 450,000 for the last two weeks in November.

In isolating the areas of reduced job losses we note that healthcare continues to be the area of the economy that has consistently added workers during the recession. Since September, healthcare has added an additional 100,000 workers and nearly 900,000 workers since the recession began in December of 2007. Other areas of job improvement since September are: the federal government and state government education accounting for an increase in approximately 50,000 jobs; and professional and business services adding over 100,000 jobs largely in temporary help services.  Importantly, for the first time this year, the average workweek increased to 33.2 hours from a cycle low of 33.0 hours in October.  The average workweek improved more in the manufacturing sector expanding to 40.4 hours from 40.0 hours in September. This reflects the recurring order and shipment strength in the manufacturing sector since last summer.

Conversely, most other areas of the economy continued to record job losses including manufacturing, finance, construction, retail and wholesale trade and information services. While the Labor Dept. reports almost 41% of reporting industries are now hiring, a cycle high, that leaves nearly 60% that are not. The surge in temporary help jobs indicates businesses are wary of the economic recovery and are reticent to add to payrolls. Furthermore, the labor force has declined by over 100,000 workers since September indicating an increase in discouraged workers despite the improvement in the economy. The decline in the civilian labor force would also partly explain the decline in the unemployment rate in November. Another benchmark of employment in the weekly and monthly reports indicate no improvement in the numbers of long term unemployed and under-employed workers. In fact, the numbers of long term unemployed increased to over 9 million or 38% of total unemployed at the end of November, a record level.  In addition, while first time unemployment claims have declined sharply, they are still recording well above 400,000 claims per week. Finally, the response from consumers in recent surveys indicate jobs are hard to get by an overwhelming margin despite the economic improvement in the third and fourth quarters. These measures do not support the monthly improvement in employment reported by the Labor Dept. since August and we have repeatedly said so in our blog articles on the monthly employment reports going back to last July.

Nonetheless, if the monthly employment report from the Labor Dept. is indeed true and not distorted by seasonal adjustments and faulty assumptions that are part of this survey’s results, then  it would appear that unemployment in this cycle is peaking and job creation is virtually around the corner early next year. This would be well ahead of consensus expectations, including our own, in projecting a peak in unemployment and the transition to job creation in the middle and latter part of 2010, respectively. It is important to note that the Labor Dept. will be making final revisions to its 2009 monthly employment data in March of 2010. In its initial revision to 2009 monthly employment data in August, the Labor Dept. revealed that unemployment this year was actually almost 900,000 workers higher than originally reported. Similar revisions were made to monthly data in 2007 and 2008. With that as a background and the contradictory results of other unemployment data and surveys, we are skeptical the employment cycle is turning this strongly and this fast.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Healthcare Reform and the Democrats: We have seen the enemy and they are us!

Morris Segall      Blue Dog Democrats, democrats, economics, economy, healthcare plan, healthcare reform, obama, republicans

As I feared from the beginning, the future of President Obama’s proposals were going to be in the hands of conservative or “Blue Dog” Democrats largely from the south, west and midwest. Their opposition to the high costs of the plan and a large federal presence in the system was going to be the defeat of the President’s program, rather than the expected “knee jerk” Republican opposition. The Republicans are now a marginal party lacking numbers and influence in the Congress to pass or defeat any legislation. It now appears the “Blue Dogs” will win out and “water down” the President’s plan to the point where it will be largely a failure in terms of progressive healthcare reform. It will eliminate a federal entity to offer insurance in competition to the private insurance industry. It will exempt thousands of so called small businesses, even those with payrolls of $500,000. It will also extract higher health insurance premiums on low-middle income wage earners. And most egregiously, push more of the increased Medicaid burden on the states who are already facing massive budget deficits and have no money to pay for anything. As a result of the “Blue Dog” opposition, in conjunction with the negative statements from the Republicans and the propaganda from the healthcare industry, popular support for the President’s program has been seriously eroded and the fact that Congress will adjourn for the month of August without passing healthcare reform legislation will give the President’s opponents an entire month to erode popular support further and “gut” the pending bills in committees even more.

I fear the final result will be little if any real healthcare reform; increased premiums for insured’s, particularly if private insurance firms have to accept less healthy members; and a continued increase in uninsured people as businesses are exempt from providing mandatory healthcare coverage. The winners will be the insurance and pharmaceutical industries who will have “dodged” a bullet for massive healthcare overhaul and reform. The costs to them will be a fraction of what the President’s program would have cost them and they will make it up by charging higher prices to the public. The losers will be the public who will continue to pay more for an unworkable system and doctors who will get paid less in an effort to control healthcare costs. By the way, the cost saving from the current compromise plan agreed to by the Democrats in the House is  $100 billion, the amount we sunk into General Motors and Chrysler in a futile attempt to save them from bankruptcy. As I said in my previous piece, it would appear we are more prone to spending billions saving corporate America than insuring the health of the American public.

The Democratic Party offered the American public comprehensive healthcare reform in the last two elections and the American public gave the Democratic Party the electoral majority they needed to get it done. It appears the Democrats decided that was a promise they are not willing to keep.

Morris R. Segall

Recommended reading:

Turning the Corner: GDP, Housing and Cash for Clunkers

An Open Letter to Congress

—–

June Employment Report—”Green Shoots” Fading

Morris Segall      business, economics, economy, employment report, unemployment

Thursday’s release of June unemployment numbers has cast a pall over the economic recovery thesis for the second half of this year. The report was pervasively weak. The overall job loss reported of 467,000 was much higher than expected and the breadth of the job losses was even more disappointing. Every industry sector except healthcare saw
increased job losses in June than in May with striking increases in the Professional and Business services and Government sectors. The negative tone and implications of the June report sapped the stock market on Thursday, knocking the major market averages down almost 3% and leading market sectors like commodities down even more.

We believe the June employment report and the attending stock market reaction signal the beginning of the long awaited stock market corrections both here and abroad as the prevailing optimistic sentiment regarding the U.S. economy is now in doubt. This change in sentiment and the upcoming earnings guidance from companies reporting second quarter results this month are expected to put increased pressure on the elevated stock markets. We expect the capital market declines to be led by commodities, particularly energy, which have paced the market gains since March. The weakening economic outlook diminishes the recovery story for materials and energy given a protracted weak demand environment.

Our capital markets strategy of holding significant cash reserves in anticipation of market corrections, while the U.S. economic recovery was in doubt, should provide a cushion to near term market declines but more importantly, provide liquidity to invest in the market at lower prices. We are “bullish” on stocks over the 2010-2012 period and believe the stock market lows of this past March are the cycle lows for this recession. But the markets, particularly foreign stock markets have appreciated very much, very fast and needed confirmation of an economic recovery to stimulate an upsurge in corporate earnings to sustain the recent market strength. Failing that, the markets were in our opinion, fully valued. So we will watch the slope of market weakness to see where it lands but be prepared for at least a 5% to possibly 10% correction, particularly if corporate earnings guidance for the remainder of this year and the early part of next year is disappointing.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Third Quarter — Still at the Bottom of the “L”

Morris Segall      2009 economy, business landscape, consumers, economy, government, slowdown

I continue to be surprised at the over-optimism of the mainstream financial press and government spokespeople on the current economic environment which is leading to increased forecasts of economic recovery beginning as early as this year’s third quarter.

Headlines indicating some economic improvement from higher consumer sentiment readings, a guarded optimistic reading on the economy from the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee this past week, a marginal improvement in the rate of economic decline in this year’s first quarter GDP and an impressive growth in the Advance report on Manufacturers Factory Orders for May were used as the basis for this continued optimism and a reversal in the stock market slide of the week before.

So once again I must put the facts on the table:

1. The fractional improvement in first quarter from -5.7% to -5.5% was entirely due to a smaller reduction in business inventories. In fact, consumer spending was actually reduced from a 1.3% gain to .95% thus shading the contribution from consumer improvement.

2. The strong improvement in Manufacturers Factory Orders in May is up only 1.5%, excluding transportation (primarily commercial aircraft), from the severely depressed level of March and is down 23% from May, 2008 levels. More importantly, the book/bill ratio of orders versus shipments in May was 95% versus approximately 96% in March and April. Thus non-transportation factory orders are no better and in some respects worse than they were at the end of depressed first quarter levels.

3. The Federal Reserve statement, while expressing guarded optimism that the worst of the economic contraction was behind us, kept interest rates at essentially 0% because the economy is still functioning at a depressed level.

4. On Friday, the government reported a surge in consumer incomes in May of 1.4% fed largely by government social security stimulus checks. On the other hand, consumer spending in May increased only .3% and the personal savings rate increased to 6.9%, a 15 year high. This low level of spending and the further increase in consumer savings on top of already historically high levels tells us the consumer is still very much concerned about the current economic environment, refuting his statements on consumer surveys, and is not ready to start pulling us out of recession by a surge in spending.

In our blog posting, “Beware Over-Exuberant Reactions to this Week’s Economic News,” (May 28, 2009), we stated “the second and third quarters of this year will be “less worse” than the first quarter but not an end to the recession”. We characterize the current economic environment as the bottom of an “L”. We have been projecting second quarter GDP to contract 2%-3% but with the continued weakness in consumer spending through May, GDP contraction in Q2 could reach 4%. Furthermore, we see little evidence that consumer spending will miraculously turn higher in Q3, particularly with continued high levels of unemployment which we expect will go higher over the summer spurred by layoffs from GM and Chrysler. Thus at this juncture, we expect Q3 GDP to be in a range of 0% to down 2%-3% depending on the level of U.S. government spending in the quarter. This is well below the 1%-3% growth in third quarter GDP many economists are currently projecting. If we are right, stock markets here and around the world are setting themselves up for a material correction from the elevated levels achieved this week.

An economic recovery will occur and we still believe it is largely a 2010 event but the continuation of the current economic torpor is pushing the recovery further into next year. We continue to be vigilant for real indications of a sustainable improvement in consumer spending which is a prerequisite to any recovery from this recession.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

The President’s Financial System Overhaul: It’s Time

Morris Segall      2009 economy, bailout, banking system, business landscape, economy, The new Fed actions

After a year of speculation and discussion, President Obama released his plan for reform and regulation of the nation’s financial system. There were few surprises. With more oversight and control centered in the Federal Reserve and augmented with newly created boards, the plan brings under new regulation and supervision virtually all major sectors and products of the financial services industry.

Born out of the cataclysmic financial losses of the current recession, the President’s plan seeks to avoid a repetition of the circumstances and events that led to the recent financial system meltdown. It is the quid pro quo for the federal government bailing out the U.S. credit system and nobody should be surprised at the far reaching reform and regulation embodied in the plan.

In the most sweeping regulation of the financial sector in this country since the Great Depression, it creates unprecedented power to seize banking institutions and intercede in the transaction systems in the financial marketplace. This would include the “breakup” of large financial conglomerates that pose a heightened risk to the functioning and integrity of the financial system.

Critics are bemoaning that the increased intrusion of the federal government in the affairs of the financial marketplace may cause restriction and higher costs of credit to borrowers. With all due respect, that has already occurred as a result of the massive debt losses sustained by the nation’s credit intermediaries and its investors and placement firms.

Like it or not the financial marketplace and its players are going to have to deal with more stringent governmental oversight and regulation to protect the country from another financial meltdown from insufficient credit risk underwriting.  The constriction of credit, the inability to conduct market transactions in asset backed securities and consumer and banking failures necessitate the comprehensive overhaul of the nation’s financial system.

The mandating of increased oversight of the nation’s banks including higher capital and liquidity standards and the assumption of prudent risk and the offering of high risk products will force the banking system to adopt a more stable lending and responsible posture. The regulation of credit card companies and mortgage brokers and other financial intermediaries serving consumers is required to also enforce higher standards of professional conduct, better risk underwriting and most of all, consumer protections from fraudulent and abusive practices.

Importantly, the overhaul plan includes regulation of the “paper” created around the asset based lending that leveraged and securitized these transactions and have been a major contributor to investor and lender losses as the value of such paper eroded more than the assets they backed and became illiquid.

Unfortunately, the President’s plan does not use this opportunity to streamline the regulatory system. We believe there are still too many agencies involved in the new regulatory framework and may lead to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in industry oversight. However, no new regulatory plan of this magnitude was going to be perfect and the overall benefits will outweigh the organizational faults. We also believe industry participants will adapt and operate successfully in the new environment and/or exit the more risky sectors of the financial marketplace. This will inure to the benefit of lenders and borrowers in providing a safer and fairer financial system.

The credit industry over the 2004-2007 period lost its way and its mistakes in the extension of credit to poor credit risks and the leveraging of those risks would have plunged us into a massive depression were it not for the Herculean federal rescue. It’s time we got this critical industry and system back under control.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Unemployment And The Cycle

Morris Segall      Chrysler, economy, GM, unemployment

Today’s unemployment report for the month of  May,  showed a stunning decrease in the monthly trend of job losses since the recession intensified in the fourth quarter of last year. The Labor Dept reported non farm payrolls declined by 345,000 in May, the lowest monthly level of job losses since last September, and far below analysts’ expectations of 500,000 lost jobs in May. Combined with the recent downward trend in first time unemployment claims seen in the months of April and May, we believe the current level of monthly losses in the U.S. economy has subsided from 600,000-700,000 to 500,000-600,000 reflecting the already massive cutbacks in payrolls over the last six months. However, we are highly skeptical that monthly job losses have declined below the 400,000 level at this point in the cycle for the following reasons:

1. The May figure of -345,000 is not consistent with the ongoing level of first time unemployment claims of 600,000+ reported through the month of May.

2. The May figure of -345,000 is not consistent with the rising level of long term unemployed workers that reached over 6.7 million during the month of May.

3. The May figure of -345,000 in the Business survey is not corroborated by the less quoted Household Survey which showed an increase in unemployment of 787,000.

4. The May figure of -345,000 does not reflect the continued increase in part time and discouraged workers which now number over 11 million.

We believe the May job losses will be revised downward when the June unemployment report is released next month. The monthly unemployment report from the government is becoming increasingly unreliable in its initial release, and has been subject to consistent and often large revisions in subsequent monthly releases.

Nonetheless, were it not for the forthcoming increases in job cuts coming from the restructuring of GM and Chrysler, we would be comfortable in stating that the rate of new job destruction has peaked for this cycle, which is a prerequisite to a bottoming in this recession. Next must come a peaking in the level of long term or continuing unemployment claims. But a recession bottom is not an economic recovery. The current level of TOTAL unemployed, and part time, discouraged and underemployed workers is approximately 25 million, and there can be no recovery until these people get back to work and start spending again. So while we have hit the nadir of this recession in terms of rate of economic contraction, we fear it will be the fourth quarter of this year before any measurable economic growth will be reported.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Current Economic News Needs A Dose Of Reality

Morris Segall      economy, news, recession

Pardon us for interrupting the party but we felt the economy was going to hit a DEMAND bottom at the end of the first quarter as inventories, employment, factory orders and consumer spending plummeted to depths at which they were unlikely to contract further. But a demand bottom did not mean we were at a recession bottom. The current economic condition is comparable to falling to the bottom of a swimming pool. You reach a point where you hit bottom. That doesn’t mean you rise back to the surface. One can lay on the bottom for a while longer. That is where we believe we are in the current cycle. Here’s why:

1. The April unemployment report which showed a reduction in job losses to under 500,000
masked a large component of temporary federal government hires for next year’s census.
Job losses in the private sector were over 600,000 and continued to afflict every industry
sector except government and healthcare, the only sectors that have added jobs in the
last seven months. In addition, prior months job losses have been revised downward. The
average monthly loss in jobs in the first quarter of 2009 is now approximately 700,000
versus a little over 500,000 in the fourth quarter of 2008. More importantly, continuing job
losses have risen to over 6.25 million from approximately 4.5 million at year end 2008. To
come are large job losses from the downsizing and restructuring of GM and Chrysler over
the summer.

2. Reflecting the increased level of job losses and constricted credit availability, consumers
continue to reduce their outstanding debt. In March consumer debt outstanding declined by
a record $11 billion. Since the third quarter of last year consumer credit outstanding has
declined by nearly $32 billion and consumers savings rate has climbed to over 4%. Further,
consumers are using debit cards instead of credit cards paying cash instead of increasing
the use of credit.

3. After holding below 3% since the fourth quarter of 2008 the yield on 10 year U.S.
Treasury Notes rose above 3%, escalating to over 3.25% last week. We have been warning of the upward pressure on interest rates lurking in the skirts of a recession bottom. As optimism of such a bottom increases and stocks continue to rise, money shifts from bonds to stocks. More importantly, the supply of new Treasury financing for the burgeoning federal budget deficits are forcing interest rates up. Speaking of federal deficits, we have projected the current fiscal year deficit of $2 trillion
(See our latest Economic Update, May 1, 2009). Today, the White House increased its
projection of the current fiscal year deficit to $1.8 trillion. We don’t think they are done.

4. Not so quietly, oil prices have escalated 20% to over $55 per barrel since mid April. Likewise, gasoline prices have escalated and are now well over $2.00 per gallon at the pump.

We believe these factors are going to slow down the consumer recovery and prolong the demand bottom we believe we are now experiencing. Yesterday’s April retail sales report was surprisingly weak, further evidence of the consumer’s unwillingness and inability to increase his spending currently. Given the continued high levels of unemployment and consumer spending retrenchment plus the new increases in interest rates and gasoline prices, we do not think the nascent improvement in economic activity is sustainable through the summer when auto job losses hit. We may be seeing a “sawtooth” pattern of episodic improvement followed by retrenchment. We are hopeful the fourth quarter may be the first concrete period of economic recovery but the auto industry job cuts make that forecast less predictable than we believed earlier. This may push recovery into the first half of next year.

So yes it looks like we are reaching a deceleration in the rate of economic contraction but it is too soon to break out the champagne and the stock market needs a correction to stay healthy. We have been bullish on the 1-3 year outlook on U.S. stocks for some time believing the stock market would “smell” out a recession bottom well before the economy recovered as it always has. The rally in stocks since early March is consistent with that trend but it is now vulnerable to disappointing economic data. However, we believe the early March market lows are this cycle’s lows and we expect a correction near term to hold above the early March levels. We would use such a correction to increase investment allocations in equities with a 1-3 time horizon.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Title: I’m Mad As Hell: Conclusion

Morris Segall      economic, economy, government, investment, NASDQ, recession, recovery, stocks

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series.  Part two discussed the first four trends and developments.  Part three discussed public anger.  Part four discussed the declining economy causes spiraling stress.  Part five discussed the long-term implications for the recession.  And now we will wrap up this series with some concluding thoughts:

We expect the U.S. recession to end later this year and gradually begin recovery next year and accelerate through 2011, 2012 and 2013. The U.S. recovery will stimulate the export dependent economies overseas and they will recover accordingly.

After a strong cyclical recovery, the U.S. will settle into a stagflationary economic cycle characterized by a secular high level of unemployment, lower worker productivity, a resumption of higher energy, food and commodity inflation and slower consumer income growth and spending.

High deficits, increased entitlement spending, increased interest rates and a depreciated currency will deteriorate U.S. government finances.

Emerging markets overseas in Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America will again pace future long-term economic growth.

Americans will shift politically to the left as they become more dependent on government spending for basic needs and income.

Populations in mature industrialized economies will shift politically to the right as they become more nationalistic to protect jobs, companies and existing social welfare programs. They will also be less inclined to pursue free trade in the future.

Free trade will still be important to emerging industrialized economies as they continue to pursue export oriented economic growth and employment. This will increase tensions between the mature economies such as Western Europe, Japan and the U.S. and the emerging economies of Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe.

From a capital markets standpoint, we remain defensive in the short term as we look for evidence of an economic bottoming. However, we would prepare to emphasize common stocks, particularly large cap and NASDAQ U.S. stocks to participate in a bottoming in the recession and subsequent economic recoveries here and abroad. We would also increase our positions in gold and other commodities as the world economies reflate and commodity prices increase. Concomitantly, we would avoid bonds as they will see a shift in cash to stocks and an increase in interest rates in an economic recovery.  Please contact us with any questions regarding this article and for specific recommendations on your investment program.

I’m Mad As Hell (Part 5): Long Term Implications Of The Recession

Morris Segall      economics, economy, fears, politics, recession, social implications

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series.  Part two discussed the first four trends and developments.  Part three discussed public anger.  Part four discussed the declining economy causes spiraling stress.  Today’s entry discusses the long-term implications for the recession:

We believe the current trends and developments have longer-term significance and implications for the U.S. and overseas countries, politically, socially and economically.  From an intermediate term economic outlook perspective, we believe the current recession will “bottom out” in the second or third quarters of this year. We believe the worst of the recession is now being experienced in the first quarter. We do not expect an economic recovery to be measurable until the fourth quarter of this year, at the earliest, and possibly the first half of next year.

Assuming a recovery from the current recession gets underway next year and builds through 2011, 2012 and 2013, we expect such a recovery to be cyclical and quite robust given the pent-up demand that is accruing from consumers and businesses over the past 5 quarters. The economic recovery will be led by the U.S and extend overseas late in 2010 and more pronounced in 2011, 2012 and 2013.

However, longer term, we see the following resulting implications from this recession:

1.       Americans will be more circumspect in assuming risk going forward. They will not embrace the unbridled use of credit as they have in the past. First, the availability and cost of credit in the future will restrict credit to consumers. Second, many consumers will eschew the use of credit to maintain lifestyle given the difficulty they have faced in meeting debt obligations.

2.       Americans will be more conservative in their investment programs after the cyclical rebound expected over the next 2-3 years in worldwide equity markets. For one thing, Americans will be older and less inclined to take risk with their remaining and/or rebuilt capital, particularly in retirement plans. Second, Americans’ faith in the equity markets has been shaken by two market declines of 50% in the past 9 years plus the scandals also attendant with these declines. We believe Americans will retreat to a more basic and conservative investment profile that emphasizes intrinsic and transparent value and predictable future prospects. In addition, we expect a more highly regulated environment for financial firms and capital markets which should result in less leveraged and speculative investment products and strategies.

3.       Americans will have to work longer before retiring as a result of the huge losses in savings, net worth and retirement accounts. However, many of the current generation of middle aged and senior workers will be suffering deteriorated health as a result of the current emotional and physical stress they are currently experiencing. These workers will have aged faster than otherwise due to the emotional and physical stresses of this recession. This will result in many workers having to retire earlier than planned which will add to the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and private pension costs. These increased costs will be in addition to the enormous increase in Federal entitlement program costs from the retirement of the “Baby Boomer” generation of workers who begin to turn 65 in 2011 and will reach age 70 in 2016.

4.       As a result of the wealth and job destruction in this recession and the impending retirement of so many workers, the demand for increased government services to handle a burgeoning aging and retirement population will put enormous strain on the U.S. Federal budget. This will be in addition to the huge strain on Federal finances that is now being incurred from the massive “bailout” programs that are being initiated to stabilize the banking system and end the current recession. It is likely the annual Federal budget deficits will range from $500 billion to $1 trillion or more over the next 5 years.  Clearly this will put upward pressure on interest rates and price inflation in the U.S. and downward pressure on the U.S. Dollar in foreign currency markets. Indeed, we and other economists have raised the threats of these developments presently and they are already of concern to foreign governments and investors that own U.S. Treasury bonds.

5.       Unemployment in the U.S. will be historically high even with a cyclical economic recovery projected over the 2010-2013 period. There simply will be no job opportunities for many of the former Wall St. and banking managers, executives and traders and automobile and related managers and executives, particularly over the age of 50.

6.       The increasing population of aging and retired workers will not have the financial resources anticipated for this population segment at the beginning of this decade when the stock market bubble at that time had created so many retirement plan millionaires. As a result, the projected retirement population will live more frugally than earlier projected and will not be the economic stimulus many had planned on. Indeed, for the reasons stated previously, they will be more of a drain on the U.S. economy than help. In addition, they will not provide the spending for increased foreign imports or overseas travel as previously predicted.

7.       We expect international trade agreements to be less liberal here and abroad, as the infatuation with globalization becomes a casualty of the massive unemployment in the current recession.

Be sure to subscribe to receive the conclusion of this series.

I’m Mad As Hell (Part 2)

Morris Segall      economics, economy, future trends, international, macro, micro, monetary policy, political, social, social unrest

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series.  Part two will discuss the first four trends and developments that are unfolding:

1.       Social unrest in Russia, Eastern and Western Europe as rising unemployment and cutbacks in domestic government spending programs and consumer incomes. Of particular note are the

street demonstrations and strikes in Western Europe where we have not seen this type of reaction to economic distress since the Great Depression of the 1930′s. It speaks volumes about the level of angst and anger among foreign workers and consumers.

2.       This social unrest is creating political change. Governments in Latvia and Iceland have already collapsed and there is increasing pressure on the governments in Ireland, France and Great Britain to stop the bleeding in those economies. Even in Russia, discontent among the populace is being aimed at the current government, which had been quite popular last year.

3.        Worker protests abroad are leading to increased calls for expulsion of immigrant workers and protectionist measurers to protect domestic jobs and companies. Globalization has now become very unpopular in the advanced industrialized countries of Western Europe as they face the same erosion of their industrial base as we have suffered over the past decade.    There have been attacks on immigrant workers in Western Europe and Russia as frustrated and angry citizens fight for the shrinking job markets in their countries. In short, we see a movement to the political right as nationalist feelings replace the internationalist perspectives previously held overseas. This does not augur well for the future of the European Union and free trade policies.

4.       The rise in protectionism is also occurring here in the U.S. as shown by the recent rescission of long haul trucking privileges to Mexican companies that were hauling freight into the U.S. from Mexico. That freight must now be transported from the border by U.S. firms. Mexico responded by putting tariffs on a list of U.S. imports. This backlash against free trade agreements is putting pressure on government leaders who still champion globalization as desirable for U.S. economic growth. Policymakers in Washington and Fortune 500 companies that manufacture and trade overseas are finding themselves at odds with workers and consumers who are losing their jobs to lower cost foreign labor. With unemployment in this country effectively at 9% and going higher, American workers are “mad as hell and aren’t going to take it anymore”. Labor unions helped elect Barack Obama. They expect “payback”.  Importantly, Democrats in Congress and the President himself have pledged to re-evaluate America’s free trade agreements and policy. We expect some “pullback” from the liberal free trade policies of the last decade.

Next up, we’ll outline additional trends and provide context for where all of this is heading.  Don’t forget to subscribe to our blog to get the rest of this series.

I’m Mad As Hell (Part 1)

Morris Segall      domestic policy, economy, globalization, recession, trends

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

The above mantra from the movie “Network” is but one symptom of the increasing social, emotional, physical and political cost of the worldwide recession which is now entering its second year.  For those of you that have been following our commentaries over the past three years you know that we have written extensively on the financial and economic trends and developments that have led to the current severe worldwide recession and our views of the reactions of the U.S. and foreign governments to this recession. However, the length and severity of this recession are causing in our opinion additional high, and we believe, long lasting social, physical and political costs that will represent significant changes in worldwide economic growth and social and political attitudes, particularly in the U.S., going forward.

As we have been stating for some time, this recession was initially caused by the bursting of the housing bubble here in the U.S. which then spread to the financial system and finally to the business, non-residential real estate and state and local government sectors. The U.S. recession has spread worldwide as our economy contracted and credit losses expanded to overseas banking and export dependent economies. Indeed the negative impacts of recessions overseas are more severe on foreign economies than here in the U.S.

Be sure to subscribe to our blog to read the rest of this ongoing series.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

In the Global Fight Against Recession, Is the U.S. a Party of One?

Morris Segall      bailout, banking system, economy, government, The new Fed actions, their implications and political fallout, treasury

Today the Federal Open Market Committee voted to increase the stimulus to the credit markets by keeping the Fed Funds rate in a 0%-.25% target range. In addition they voted to have the Fed purchase:

• Up to $300 billion of long-term Treasury securities
• Another $100 billion of U.S. Government Agency debt making a total of $200 billion
• An additional $750 billion of mortgage backed securities making a total of $1.25 trillion

In addition the Open Market Committee voted to launch the Treasury’s TALF program to purchase consumer and business asset backed securities. This program will start at $200 billion but could expand to a $1 trillion.

The Fed’s actions are based on what the Open Market Committee states are continued recessionary pressures in the U.S. economy. With today’s actions, the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve is estimated to have expanded to approximately $3 trillion. This compares to assets of less than $1 trillion six months ago. It would seem the Fed is throwing in the towel on a recession bottom in 2009.

This compares to Chairman Ben Bernanke’s testimony on February 14th before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in which he forecast an end to the recession by the end of this year. Clearly there is some disconnect between the Fed’s current actions and the Federal Reserve Chairman’s outlook.

Indeed, the most recent economic data released this month and recent corporate announcements from several large banks indicate there is some hope the pace of economic and earnings contraction may be slowing. We have communicated to our clients and audiences that we felt the worst of the current recession would be felt in the first quarter of this year. If we and Chairman Bernanke are correct, today’s Fed actions are too much at the wrong time and will have negative consequences intermediate-longer term. We warned in our last blog posting, “Is There a Plan Here?” the increasing concern among international creditors about the future creditworthiness of the U.S. government given the outsized spending of the current bailout programs. It is noteworthy that the Chinese government just last week expressed misgivings about their large holdings of U.S. Treasury debt and further purchases going forward. Today’s massive new spending by the Fed will cause further alarm in international financial circles. While today’s announcement of Fed purchases of long term Treasuries suppressed interest rates on government debt and provided fresh fodder for further stock market gains, it is important to note today’s large decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar in currency future markets and the simultaneous large increase in the price of gold futures in commodity markets.

The Federal Open Market Committee is preoccupied with deflation as a result of the current recession. Yet the price of oil has moved to nearly $50 per barrel from approximately $35 per barrel a month ago. In addition the most recent reports on consumer prices for January and February show an annualized rate of inflation of 2.5% excluding food and fuel and inflation and rates much higher in key non discretionary spending categories. The recent rise in energy and service prices belie a chronic deflationary environment or outlook. The unbridled U.S. government and Federal Reserve spending on the multitude of stimulus and bailout programs has been rejected by our overseas trading and financial partners despite this government’s pleas for more foreign government stimulus spending. These governments are afraid of the inflationary bubbles and sovereign balance sheet erosions that will result from such unfettered spending. So the Treasury Dept. and the Fed plot their own course of uncapped spending as their answer to the current credit and economic dilemmas.

Speaking of dilemmas, President Obama is feeling the heat on what is clearly a botched bailout of AIG and an erosion of confidence amongst economists and politicians in Treasury Secretary Geithner. The public is angry and very stressed over the recession. The economy is President’s Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s problem now and the public wants to see results from the hodgepodge programs the government is implementing. The current scandals regarding executive bonuses and the perceived inadequacies of the Treasury leadership will in our opinion start to erode the President’s poll numbers adding a further difficulty to the current social and economic environment.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Is There A Plan Here?

Morris Segall      collapse, economics, economy, failure, future, government, plan, recession, tax, world

Like Alice’s plunge down the rabbit hole, the government’s proposed recovery strategy gets curiouser and curiouser every day!  Rather than helping the consumer to save, pay down his debt and get back into the game, we continue pumping money into faltering and distressed Fortune 1000 companies. Most of these wounded entities have pursued risky and inept business strategies and made ill-advised acquisitions in the last two years.  If BOA is choking on the debt from buying Countrywide Credit and Merrill Lynch, why shouldn’t it be forced to sell off assets to raise capital?   Capital One, already in trouble with underperforming credit card debt, has made two commercial bank acquisitions since 2005, the peak of the housing bubble.  Infusing taxpayer money into these large corporations on the premise that they are too big to fail is just not sound fiscal policy. Perhaps they shouldn’t have been allowed to “get too big to fail” in the merger and acquisition mania of 2005-07. At what point do we hold the senior managements and boards of directors and even the shareholders of these companies accountable for the disastrous decisions that now taxpayers are asked to pay for?  Remember, these are some of the biggest multi-national corporations in the world with supposedly the best managements, at least according to their paychecks. As the song says, “breaking up is hard to do” but we unwound the conglomerates created in the 1960′s in the recessions of 1973-74 and 1980-82. Divestiture raises capital and creates competition.

Rather than keeping banks and other industries on life support with more capital infusions, we should be:

• sending rebate checks to middle class taxpayers earning below $150,000 with an inducement to encourage saving and debt reduction;
• creating a graduated sales tax to help middle and lower income consumers;
• boosting tax revenue by instituting luxury consumption taxes on big-ticket items: luxury cars, boats, second homes, etc.;
• forcing troubled companies to raise capital by selling assets they have acquired;
• repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax for taxpayers earning less than $250,000 in taxable income;
• creating a “WPA” program for unemployed accountants, managers, IT programmers, administrators and researchers to oversee and manage the bailout money and stimulus programs.

The only worthwhile prescription to save struggling banks is for the Federal government to set up a “bad debt bank” to get nonperforming loans off the balance sheets (see our website article, “The Treasury Plan”, Dec. 7, 2007).  Banks won’t lend while they’re strangling on the paper that’s backing bad loans.  A “bad debt bank” will allow the U.S. to renegotiate bad loans, forestall foreclosures and hold bad assets for long-term resale. It’s the only way we’re going to free the banks and credit intermediaries to make new loans.

Now the President wants to curtail the tax deductions for charitable giving and mortgage interest on upper income taxpayers just as we are trying to stimulate housing and asking charities to do more in this recession.  Cutting back on deductions for mortgage interest and charitable donations would be disastrous!  Rather than raising revenue, the former would stop many upper income homebuyers in their tracks. The latter would be devastating for non-profit organizations.  Upper income taxpayers are the backbone of charitable giving.  If charities are expected to carry more of the social service costs during tough times, why cut their major source of giving?  If this pattern of penalizing the rich continues, expect America’s wealthy to move their assets to offshore tax havens and more taxpayers will create trusts to escape taxation altogether thus reducing rather than increasing tax revenues.

The litany of misdirected tactics goes on and on!  Another bank or industry bailout is just a waste of your money and mine. The Federal government is already the de-facto banking industry in this country given all the money invested in the industry and the widespread guarantees of deposits. Recovery of this recession was always going to take a long period of time until the consumer got his balance sheet back into creditworthy condition thus allowing him to “get back into the game”.  These bailout and stimulus programs are costly diversions from the underlying cure and they are now, along with the President’s ambitious spending budgets, creating concern among economists and international traders about the future creditworthiness of the U.S. government. We warned about this possibility in our website article of Sept. 8, 2008, “Stocks, Recession and the Bailout”.  Apparently we are not alone.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

The Economy: Getting Through The Recession (updated)

Morris Segall      climate, depression, economic, economy, global, government, international, recession, slowdown, strategy, survival, trends

Today’s Business Landscape And What’s On The Other Side

Morris Segall      business, business landscape, economics, economy, future trends, macro, micro, trends

If you think it is bad here…

Morris Segall      bailout, economy

As bad as economic conditions are here in the U.S. they are worse overseas. In our website articles, “The Economy, Bailout and the Capital Markets“, December 8, 2008 and “… The Virus Has Spread”, August 6. 2008 we project the U.S. recession spreading overseas with more dramatic negative impact. In our December 8 article we highlight the fall of foreign economies into recession making the current recession worldwide in scope.  We were not pessimistic enough. The rapid erosion of overseas economies into deep recessions has been a surprise to most analysts and economists. The just announced decline of the Japanese economy in the calendar fourth quarter of 2008 at a nearly 13% annualized rate is the latest in a series of economic contractions recorded in the fourth calendar quarter of last year, including most of the countries in Western Europe and the U.S. It confirms our analyses in previous articles that the worldwide recession would be led by the mature, export oriented economies of Western Europe and Japan. The worsening economic conditions in the industrialized world would telescope back into the export dependent economies of Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and Latin America. These emerging market economies have also been severly wounded by the collapse of oil and other industrial commodities which had been major stimulants to the accelerated growth of these economies.

The combination of collapsing commodity prices, virtually zero import demand from major trading partners, the bursting of overbuilt and overpriced real esate and manufacturing projects has caused a rapid increase in foreign unemployment and a deepening banking credit crisis in many foreign countries. Without the countervailing strength of healthy domestic consumption sectors, most emerging industrialized countries are joining the mature, industrialized economies in deepening recession which have further to go given the 6-12 month time lag of overseas economic trends to those of the U.S.

As economic trends get worse and last longer overseas in 2009-10, unemployment, currency values, industrial production, bank losses and corporate profits will worsen and are already resulting in credit downgrades of foregn sovereign debt. The latter is particularly worrisome in that it has already increased the cost of funding for foreign governments and is chasing money out of foreign currencies into the U.S. dollar which is near its November, 2008 highs. In newly industrialized economies in Eastern Europe and Latin America, credit downgrades may also lead to credit defaults by some governments. World banking organizations are working overtime to forestall such defaults but there may be too many “leaks in the dike” to be succesful. The erosion of foreign soverign debt ratings, the flight from foreign currencies and economic contractions more severe than in the U.S. will be another move from collateral damage of the U.S. recession to another contributor to the extension of our own by keeping exports suppressed and putting more pressure on the international banking system and credit markets.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

The Crisis Continues

Morris Segall      2009 economy, crisis, economy

The current panic in worldwide equity markets beginning overseas and today hitting the U.S. reflects a new round of concern due to continuing bank losses starting with Asian and U.K. banks and extending to further losses being reported by U.S. banks. A year ago we wrote about the worsening credit crises in banking here and abroad, “Is Something Burning”, January 22, 2008. At that time, the equity markets were in severe decline and we warned about breaching cycle lows. A year later we are witnessing a repeat as the Dow falls again below 8000 and the S & P 500 Index approaches the lows of 2002-03. Despite all the efforts by governments and central banks to stabilize the banking system we face a new round of asset writedowns. We are struck by the difference in this credit downturn and the savings and loan debacle of 20 years ago. In our opinion this adverse credit cycle is being extended by the preponderance of paper backing and leveraging the asset bubbles in real estate and consumer lending. While hard assets will reach an defineable intrinsic value in a reasonable period of time after the asset pricing bubble bursts, paper asset valuations are more ephemeral. They are subject to the vagaries of investor psychology and risk appetites. The new round of bank losses have more to do with the re-pricing of market value of paper assets than a new decline in hard assets and this is more difficult to stabilize. Government and central bank “bailout” programs are fighting to stablilize assets that have no hard value and increasingly illiquid. The cost of saving the world’s banking system is becoming staggering and may result in the system essentially becoming nationalized at least for a period of time. We are entering uncharted territory in the post war economic period with governments and central banks becoming the buyers and market makers for privately held debt.

Unemployment Numbers

Morris Segall      economy, government, investing, unemployment

The government needs to invest in new industries that actually will re-employ the increasing number of unemployed. That includes energy, biotech, and agriculture.  For example, there is a 25,000 person shortage in technicians for wind farms. We can cross-train unemployed factory workers, including unemployed auto workers, to be wind farm turbine technicians. Those jobs pay $25 per hour.

If the government is going to spend another trillion dollars they should do a massive consumer rebate program with the emphasis on consumers paying down debt and getting current on their financial obligations, including mortgage, credit card and auto loans. If the consumer gets current on his debts, the financial system won’t have to write down consumer debt obligations.

The recession and credit crisis cannot end until the consumer is made financially sound and creditworthy again. Pumping dollars into banks, credit card companies, insurance companies and auto companies will not solve the recession until the consumer starts spending and begins to move goods off retailers’ shelves.

The Economy: Getting Through the Recession

Morris Segall      economy, recession

SPG Trend Advisors and its affiliate, Sage Policy Group, make presentations on local and regional economies, the national economy, international and geopolitical issues and capital market events. We offer these presentations for our readers to gain additional information from our commentaries and further explanation of our analyses and forecasts.

Below is the first in a series of presentations we plan to showcase here on the SPG Trend blog.  While this was given on November 21, 2008, the content is still highly prescient: