The Super Committee fails: Now What?

Morris Segall      Bush tax cuts, consumer spending, democrats, Economic Growth, economic outlook, employment, eroding middle class, future trends, mandatory federal spending cutbacks, military spending, public education impairment, republicans, U.S. credit rating downgrade, U.S. economic and military superiority

Yesterday’s announcement that the Bipartisan Congressional Committee, charged with formulating a long term deficit reduction plan, could not come to an agreement on such a plan was anti-climatic. It had been rumored for weeks that the members of the committee were far apart on critical issues and by this past weekend, it was apparent no agreement was going to be reached. We had long been skeptical this committee was going to succeed (See our blog video of October 7) but we felt there was a chance statesmanship would triumph over politics at the eleventh hour. We were wrong. We have commented since last summer’s near disastrous debt limit negotiations that the ideological divide between Republicans and Democrats is so wide that the parties are incapable of bridging the gap, even when the well being of the nation is at stake. It will reside in America’s voters in next year’s election to decide this country’s long term public and fiscal policy by electing a President and Congress of one political party or the other. A split vote that results in continued divided government in Washington will be a formula for economic and social disaster.

In the meantime, Congress must fund the government past next month and decide if it will extend last year’s tax breaks via a reduced payroll tax on wage earners and extended benefits to this nation’s chronic number of long term unemployed. In the present partisan atmosphere in Washington, none of these important issues can be counted as certain of passage. Failure to pass any of these items will certainly diminish the economic outlook for next year at the least, and potentially plunge this country into economic chaos at the worst, if the government is shutdown for lack of funding.

Beyond the immediate issues affecting the economy for next year are the prospects of mandatory federal budget cutbacks and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013 as a result of the failure of the “Super Committee” to fashion a long term deficit reduction package. The combination of increased taxes and federal government spending cuts will result in higher taxes, particularly on the already stressed middle class, and significant reductions in federal assistance in vital areas such as education, again disproportionately affecting middle and lower income sectors of our economy. At the same time, mandatory federal spending reductions will fall heavily on the Defense Department causing drastic cuts vital to our national defense while our strategic enemies are increasing their defense spending and closing the gap on our technological superiority. It is this technological superiority, through necessary research and development, that allows us to field a world class military with fewer numbers than our adversaries. Oh and by the way, defense spending cutbacks of approximately $500 billion over the next ten years are estimated to cost approximately 1 million defense related jobs according to estimates by the Defense Department.

The sum of such fiscal developments, we believe, will be a low level of economic growth on an extended basis from suppressed consumer income and spending and continued high levels of unemployment. Erosion of our public education system to the detriment of a future generation of students and impairing our ability to compete in the world economy. This combination may well result in the creation of a burgeoning number of low income earners replacing what has historically been a growing and thriving American middle class. The disparity between the “haves” and “have nots” will reach historic proportions threatening the future social, economic and military superiority of the U.S. Lastly, there is no guarantee that such mandatory spending reductions will stave off a further lowering of our credit rating. Indeed, we expect the rating agencies will be taking an unfavorable opinion of our economic prospects in the near term. Lower spending matched by lower tax receipts may not result in the improved federal fiscal situation necessary to maintain our AAA credit rating. In short, absent a robust economic recovery, hallmarked by substantial job and income growth, the future social and economic outlooks for this country are not encouraging.

Morris R. Segall

August Employment: There is None

Morris Segall      Capital Markets, consumer sentiment, Economic stagnation, economy, employment, employment report, future trends, government, government stimulus, manufacturing, private sector investment, recession, slowdown, unemployment

Today’s employment report for August continued a worsening trend in the job market we have noted in our blog and website articles since June. Rather than another month of paltry job growth seen since May, job creation in August was zero. The last time the monthly employment report recorded an absence of job creation was last September. In addition, job creation for the months of June and July were revised downward a combined 58,000 jobs. Thus, over the last three months, job creation has averaged 35,000 jobs versus an average of 153,000 over the first five months of this year. Even the private sector, which has been creating a moderate level of jobs so far this year, dropped to nearly zero in job creation in August. More distressing is the event we have feared since the economy and employment faded through the second quarter. That is the shift by employers from reduced job hiring to job layoffs. In the August report, a number of industries recorded job losses including: manufacturing; construction; retail trade; transportation and information technology. The latter includes striking Verizon employees but that does not account for all of the job loss in this sector. The government sector also shed another 17,000 jobs in August. Year to date, the government sector has reduced employment by over 260,000 jobs.

As bad as these numbers are, other data in the employment report for August are even more negative. The already weak average workweek declined to 34.2 hours from 34.3 hours in June and July and is at the low level of last August. Average hourly earnings declined from July levels and are less that 2% above year ago levels, well below nominal inflation. The number of involuntary part time workers increased by approximately 400,000 to over 8.8 million workers from July and is at the highest level since last August. As we reported in prior employment report articles, the number of unemployed 5-14 weeks had been expanding in recent months. Now those people are unemployed over 15 weeks and that category has expanded to almost 59% of the number of unemployed persons.

Combined with the very weak manufacturing data reported yesterday showing major declines in orders, shipments, backlogs and employment and the plummeting levels of consumer confidence in recent surveys, and we have an economy that is “stalled out” and on the verge of sliding back into recession. We have previously cautioned about such a prospect in previous blog articles if economic data over the summer did not improve materially and fast. It hasn’t.

The private sector is doing what we expected in a weakening economic environment-cutting back. The President is expected to announce new economic stimulus measures next week to help create jobs. They will not turn the economy around. The Fed will inaugurate a QE3 program to add more liquidity if recession is imminent. The impact will be similar to that of QE2- a temporary respite but damaging to the bond market and the value of the U.S. Dollar. Without the full participation of the private sector to invest heavily into the economy and hire workers, the current economic trends and pessimistic outlook will not change. This also does not augur well for U.S. and overseas capital markets.

Morris R. Segall

The June Employment Report: Now we are getting pessimistic

Morris Segall      business spending, Capital Markets, consumer sentiment, consumer spending, debt default, deficit reduction, democrats, Economic Growth, economic recovery, future trends, inflation, job creation, June employment, obama, recession, Republican Party

Today’s employment report for the month of June is unequivocally a blow to expectations that May’s weak report was an aberration.  Instead of rebounding from May results, the June report deteriorated in virtually all key aspects  of employment. Nonfarm payrolls increased by a neglible 18,000 jobs, the weakest level of job growth in nine months. To make matters worse, the Labor Department revised downward its previous readings on job creation in April and May by a combined 41,000 jobs, including a 29,000 job reduction in May to 25,000 from an already weak level of 54,000 jobs. The June report and the April-May revisions reveal a virtual absence of job creation since April. Of the 18,000 jobs created in June, 57,000 were created in the private sector, offset by a reduction of 39,000 jobs in federal, state and local governments. Of the 57,000 private sector jobs the vast bulk of these, (34,000),  were in the Leisure and Hospitality sector- low paying, seasonal and tenuous given its sensitivity to the economy. According to the Household survey, the unemployment rate reached a year to date high of 9.2% in June despite a contraction in the labor force of over 270,000 from May levels. In addition, the June Household survey showed an increase of 173,000 in the number of unemployed workers and an increase of nearly 450,000 persons not in the labor force. Other statistics from the June monthly report include: a recessionary employment/population ratio of 58.2%; a $.01 decrease in average hourly earnings resulting in no increase in average hourly earnings since April; a decrease in the average workweek and factory overtime; an increase of 100,000 in the number of discouraged workers from May to nearly 1 million persons; an overall increase of 474,000 in those categorized as marginally attached to the labor force from May to a level of 2.7 million people; and an increase of over 400,000 from May in the number of unemployed less than 5 weeks to over 3 million persons. In June, the percentage of workers unemployed, those marginally attached to the labor force and those working part time because they can’t find full time work amounted to over 16%, the highest level this year. Two years after the recession ended, these numbers are unprecedented in post-war economic recoveries.

In our June 7th website article on May unemployment data, we concluded that the May data had been suppressed by the severe storms in the south and mid-west in April and May and the supply dislocations in Japan. We saw reassuring data in the May report that encouraged us to believe we were not on the verge of a double dip recession. Unfortunately, the June report contained none of those positives and should be relatively unimpeded by exogenous events. We believe  the June data confirms our fears that the business sector has retrenched in its spending since March, insecure in the outlook for consumer and customer end demand given the high levels of inflation and pressure on incomes and profit margins and deteriorating economic conditions in major markets overseas. This is confirmed in the underlying weakness in the June ISM manufacturing survey ( See our website article on the June Manufacturing Survey), and the weakness in the June ISM non-manufacturing survey, both released earlier this week. This retrenchment now appears to include a reduction in hiring.

This business spending retrenchment will have enormous implications for economic growth for the remainder of this year and into next if not reversed. An economy that does not provide job growth cannot grow. We have long focused on business and consumer spending as the drivers of economic recovery in the absence of contributions from housing and the government sector. Business retrenchment in spending and hiring will remove both of those drivers from the economy. The absence of private sector job creation will soon be reflected in reduced consumer sentiment and spending. Reduced consumer spending will slow business sales and pressure corporate profits causing businesses to retrench further. The net result is an economy that does not grow and one that could easily fall back into recession. We commented in our last website article how important the June employment report would be for the future direction of our economy. With the June numbers showing such employment weakness, we are now pessimistic the second half of this year will show renewed economic growth and the outlook for 2012 has become decidedly less sanguine. We expect to revise downward our expectations for GDP growth for this year to the bottom of our 2%-3% range and we may have to reduce our projections further if current economic trends persist.

We expect the weak June employment data to complicate if not preclude an agreement on raising the nation’s debt ceiling. The weakness of the June report will, in our opinion, harden the resolve of Republicans to reject revenue raising measures advocated by the President. The same employment weakness will, in our opinion, also strengthen the resolve of Democrats to avoid stringent federal spending cuts, particularly in entitlement programs. The current weakness in the economy will widen the ideological chasm between the political parties. Thus, we are not optimistic a far reaching deficit reduction program will be reached in the next two weeks. Rather we now believe a stopgap measure to avoid government default, possibly through the end of the current fiscal year, will be the only agreement that can be fashioned.

Clearly these events and the current economic environment are not conducive to stock market appreciation. In view of the recent rally in stock prices at the end of June and the first week in July, we believe the equity markets have increased downside risk and less upside potential. We would advise a more defensive and risk averse capital market strategy in light of present circumstances.

Morris R. Segall

Economic Update

Morris Segall      April job growth, consumer credit, consumer spending, corporate profits, Economic Growth, future trends, GDP, inflation, manufacturing orders and shipments, non-manufacturing orders and production, personal income, unemployment

There has been a large amount of important economic data and news over the past week that is shaping the outlook for the U.S. economy as we proceed through the second quarter.

First, preliminary GDP growth for the first quarter was reported in line with our expectations (See our blog article of April 24, “First Quarter GDP will be a Slowdown”) of just below 2% higlighted by reduced consumer spending, reduced business capital investment, negative net exports and a surprising cutback in Federal government spending in defense. Our expectations of a beginning reorder cycle in inventory accumulation is also apparent in the report. We expect the second and third revisions to the GDP report will be upward based on stronger consumer spending numbers in the Personal Income and Spending report for March and strong capital goods orders for February and March.

Consumer income and spending data released after the preliminary GDP report reveals significantly stronger growth in both in the first quarter, particularly in February and March, aggregating a total increase of 1.5% for the two months. Spending was widespread among durable and nondurable goods and services over the two month period. Savings helped fuel the spending as the savings rate dropped to 5.5% from nearly 6% in January.

Orders, shipments and backlogs of manufactured goods increased at accelerated rates in February and March with orders and shipments in March growing at an outsized rate of growth approximating 3%. Order and shipments strength continued the recovery pattern of growth in both durable and nondurable industries. Manufacturing backlogs, on a non seasonally adjusted basis, are up over 13% year over year in March.

Purchasing managers indices for manufacturing and non-manufacturing receded in April from record levels in February causing concern about an economic slowdown but examination of the subsets of the indices reveal continued strong levels from respondents regarding orders, shipments, backlogs and employment. However, respondents in both surveys noted a continuation of price increases from suppliers.

Employment growth continued in April by a stronger than expected 244,000 jobs with private sector hiring accelerating to 268,000 from upwardly revised levels of 261,000 and 231,000 in January and February, respectively. However, the unemployment rate increased to 9% in the Household survey due to a calculation of fewer jobs created versus the Business establishment survey. The increase in job creation was broad and included manufacturing, retail trade, professional and business services, healthcare and leisure and hospitality sectors. Within professional and business services, the recent improvement in management and technical consulting services and computer systems services continued and provided much of this important sector’s monthly growth. This confirms anecdotal evidence we have been gleaning for much of the February-March period. Unfortunately, the labor force participation rate has not improved from a mediocre 64.2% and the number of people working part time for economic reasons and marginally attached to the labor force increased further. In addition, wages have not increased during the first quarter and have increased less than 2%, year over year, in April, less than the rate of inflation.

Consumer credit expanded again in March for the third consecutive month in both revolving and nonrevolving credit. Most of the increase in consumer credit continues to be led by nonrevolving credit such as auto and student loans. The small increase in revolving credit in March does not bring it back to fourth quarter 2010 levels.

Finally, commodity prices declined substantially led by a collapse in silver prices. We had felt commodity prices were building a bubble similar to the price action in the summer of 2008 and we expected a similar result when they broke down in the fall of that year.

Our conclusions from all of this data is that the first quarter ended on a stronger note than expected given the rapid rise in inflation during the quarter. Demand from consumers and businesses were remarkably resilient. With the recent decline in commodity prices, even temporarily, some pressure on consumer incomes and business profitability will be relieved. This augurs well for consumer and business spending in the second and third quarters and fortifies our optimism for heightened GDP growth for these periods. Another very positive development in the first quarter was the stronger than expected level of corporate profits reported for the period. Our optimism must be tempered by adverse events overseas, the current debate regarding the federal budget, which will impact the level of federal spending going forward, and the expiration of the Fed’s QE2 program which has supported low interest rates and ample liquidity for the economy and the stock market. We will be publishing our power point, comprehensive economic update and outlook on our website shortly.

Morris R. Segall

S & P Joins the U.S. Budget Debate

Morris Segall      austerity programs, bailout, business confidence, business landscape, Capital Markets, consumer sentiment, consumer spending, Economic Growth, economic recovery, federal deficits, future trends, GDP, national debt, politics, recession, tight credit

This morning, Standard and Poor’s downgraded the U.S. credit rating outlook from stable to negative. The rating agency cited the high level of public debt as a percentage of GDP and the uncertainty that adequate actions to significantly reduce the U.S. debt level and maintain it at manageable levels would be undertaken in the forseeable future. The negative outlook and the reasoning behind it portend a “one in three likelihood of a lower long-term credit rating on the U.S. within two years” according to the text of the S & P release. Standard and Poor’s states the leverage on the U.S. balance sheet and accumulating annual deficits are higher than other countries with sovereign debt ratings of AAA.

We are not surprised by the S & P action. Indeed, in our website article of September 8, 2008, “Stocks, Recession and the Bail Out” we cautioned that the massive federal bailout of the housing and banking industries would add billions to annual deficits and the national debt. We further stated “The cumulative effect of ballooning annual federal deficits, the secular pressure on the federal budget from increasing entitlement spending and the continuing balance of trade deficit may lead to a downgrade in the U.S. government credit rating and a further aversion to U.S. dollar denominated assets longer term”. The extended decline in the U.S. dollar versus other currencies has reached historical proportions in the first four months of this year, even against the financially questionable euro. 

While we are not surprised by the S & P action, we are surprised at the timing of the ratings outlook. Why now in the heat of the budget debate between Congress and the President? Why didn’t Standard and Poor’s wait until mid May after some decision on the federal budget and increase in the debt limit would have been forthcoming? It is our opinion that by releasing this downgraded credit outlook now, it would have a significant impact on the budget deliberations and possibly tilt the argument in favor of more draconian spending cuts as advocated by the Republicans in Congress. It is not unreasonable to believe that outside credit analysts, rating agencies and economists have come to the conclusion that the U.S. must adopt an austerity spending program similar to those adopted by the European Union as a solution to its excessive debt burden. By using a time frame of three years (similar to that employed in the European austerity programs) to measure progress, S & P makes the same mistake such a short time period has created on the countries in Europe. It is simply too short a period of time to deleverage sovereign balance sheets without stifling critically needed economic growth to provide the means to paydown debt (See out website articles of December 17, 2010 and March 15, 2011).

Today’s ratings outlook release by Standard & Poor’s misses important differences between the U.S. economic situation and those of Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain. The U.S. economy is in recovery led by manufacturing, exports and more recently consumer spending. Employment gains have accelerated since last November. While the recent surge in inflation has slowed U.S. economic growth coming out of the first quarter of this year, the recovery trend is not aborted. It will be if the Federal government is forced to make drastic spending cuts which will reverse its role as an economic stimulant to an economic depressant at this sensitive point in the U.S. economic recovery. We argued in our economic articles on Europe and once again, that longer periods of time are required to deleverage these balance sheets. A longer period of time will allow the national economy to grow at a rate to raise tax receipts and pay down debt. We have long been advocates for greater fiscal discipline by the U.S. government that includes large spending cuts and higher taxes. However, a nation in recession cannot reduce its debt to GDP ratio.

By releasing its downgraded U.S. ratings outlook today, Standard and Poor’s has entered the political debate and abandoned its role as a neutral and impartial arbiter of credit conditions. Furthermore, the surprising timing of this release has caused capital markets here and around the world to decline significantly, further eroding asset values and wealth and business and consumer confidence already battered by overseas events in Japan, the Middle East and Europe. Declining capital markets and consumer and business confidence will lead to tighter credit conditions at a time when credit was just beginning to “loosen up”. This in turn will lead to investment and spending retrenchment, threatening the nascent economic recovery here in the U.S. The worries of a deteriorating U.S. financial condition in 2012 and beyond could be self fulfilling as a result of what we believe is an ill timed alarm. We will have to see in the coming days if the S & P action is transitory or longer lasting in its impact. 

Morris R. Segall

Charge!

Morris Segall      consumer credit, consumer sentiment, consumer spending, consumer spending sea change, credit card debt, Economic Growth, future trends, GDP

This past Monday afternoon, February 7th, the Federal Reserve released its report on consumer credit for the month of December, 2010.  Since peaking in the third quarter of 2008 consumer debt has steadily declined over the past two years by over $150 billion. Most of that reduction has been in revolving debt, largely credit card debt. This has reflected a combination of consumer debt repayment and the write-off of consumer loans in default by lending institutions and credit card issuers. After a further decline in November of last year, consumer revolving debt increased by nearly $2 billion on a seasonally adjusted basis or a 3.5% annual rate in December. This was the first increase since August of 2008 and most of that increase came in consumer credit card debt. Non seasonally adjusted data is more impressive, showing a better than $9 billion increase in revolving credit led by credit card gains at commercial banks. This change in credit card debt balances could be a signal the consumer de-leveraging is about over and consumer evaluations about their finances are sufficiently improved to allow them to begin increasing credit card purchases. If the December increase is not an aberration and continues in 2011, it will signify a dramatic change in the consumer spending dynamic.

 Up until last year’s fourth quarter, consumer spending had been anemic due to high unemployment and lagging consumer income growth, in addition to the de-leveraging of consumer balance sheets. That changed in the fourth quarter as consumer spending surged to pre-recession levels. The Federal Reserve data would indicate expansion of consumer spending in December was supported by the use of credit cards. This would explain the large increase in consumer spending (.7%) in the month of December, well above the .4% increase in consumer income growth in that month. If the December data portends a return to credit card financing by consumers, the prospect of continued high levels of consumer spending in 2011 is heightened. The willingness of consumers to increase credit card debt will counteract the suppressing forces of moderate consumer income growth and a continued high level of unemployment. This will promote a greater consumer spending contribution to the economy than one would have expected and augments the outlook for improved GDP growth this year, importantly led by the consumer.

 It remains to be seen if the December data is the beginning of a trend and we will be looking at future data to confirm or deny this important development. However, a note of caution. If consumers abandon the financial discipline of the past two years and return to spending in excess of income growth, a consumer spending renaissance will be short lived and a financially weak consumer sector will re-emerge, constricting long term economic growth.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

January Employment Report: Weak but Contains “Green Shoots”

Morris Segall      "green shoots" in employment, 2009 economy, 2010 employment data, employment report, future trends, strenthening 2011 economy, unemployment, winter recovery in jobs

The January monthly employment report reported on Friday showed a dispappointing creation of 36,000 jobs versus the 150,000+ again expected by economists and analysts. 2010 job market data for both the Household and Business Surveys have been revised to reflect new Census numbers and new seasonal adjustment and other measurement changes. Since October’s 171,000 revised level of new jobs, November, December and now January’s job growth have not been close to the 150,000 level expected since October. Yes, the revisions to November and December job growth numbers  have been positive, as we expected, amounting to a cumulative 40,000 additional jobs from previously reported data. Nonetheless, the average number of new jobs created in November and December of last year amount to a weak level of slightly over 100,000. We have no doubt the very low level of job creation in January was negatively affected by harsh winter weather and expect an upward revision when February monthly job data is reported because of the absolutely low level of job creation reported. We also believe the weather in January interrupted timely and more complete survey reporting. However, December winter weather was harsh also and still allowed for over 120,000 new jobs being created. In addition, the weather so far in February continues to be severe, so it might be a March thaw before job creation, per the monthly surveys, show a more normalized pattern. In addition, major benchmark revisions to 2010 data will be forthcoming in February which will reflect new readings on the 2010 labor market. Finally, the unemployment rate surprisingly dropped for the second month to 9%. However, the drop in the unemployment rate since November primarily reflects a decline in the labor force of over 750,000 workers, a sign of continued discouragement among American workers.

Despite the low level of new jobs reported, the January employment report shows some continued improvement in  labor market trends that we mentioned in our January 9th blog article. Namely, further improvement (+ 49,000) in manufacturing employment making it three consecutive months and a cumulative increase of 78,000 jobs in this important sector. It supports the strengthening in the manufacturing sector in the fourth quarter of last year which is leading to increased hiring. In addition,  jobs were created in wholesale and retail trade, in furtherance of the fourth quarter hiring in these sectors. This reflects the strong retail sales trends in the fourth quarter of last year and the positive indications for retail sales in January as recently reported by major retailers. Lastly, the January data show a drop in temporary help hiring, the first such decline in a year, and significant increases in IT and administrative jobs indicating a broadening of permanent hiring in the important Professional and Business Services category. Continuing a positive trend first seen in December, job losses due to the ending of temporary assignments dropped again by nearly 500,000 and the number of  unemployed 5-14 weeks in duration dropped by 168,000 and are down over 400,000 since October. Thus, while the overall employment situation is still weak, we see “green shoots” in the monthly data and improvement in the weekly unemployment claims data. Other positive data on consumer and business spending and manufacturing orders and production augur well for further improvement in job creation going forward.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Today’s Economic Landscape and What’s on the Other Side

Morris Segall      2009 economy, Add new tag, business landscape, Capital Markets, consumers, crisis, debt, economic, economics, employment report, future trends, GDP, government, recession, unemployment

We recently updated our presentation on today’s economic landscape and what’s on the other side with some fresh data.  We hope you continue to find value in our slides:

Third Quarter GDP Revised Down

Morris Segall      2009 economy, consumers, economics, future trends, GDP, global, government, recession, stimulas, unemployment

Yesterday’s second reading on the third quarter GDP showed a downward revision from the robust 3.5% preliminarily reported at the end of October. As November wore on expectations of the second and more definitive read on the third quarter was for a downward revision to the 3% level but no one was alarmed. It was considered more or less statistical.

After taking a look at the revisions from the preliminary report we are concerned for the following reasons:

1. Personal consumption was revised down from 3.4% growth to 2.9% with spending on goods dropping from 8.1% growth to 7.2%.
2. Business capital spending dropped from 11.5% growth  in  the preliminary report to 8.4% in the revision with large downward revisions in the growth of inventories and business structures.
3. Federal government spending growth was revised upward from  2.3%  to  3.1%.
4. Growth in final sales of domestic product was revised downward from 2.5% to 1.9%.

This revised mix of weakness in business and consumer spending with all of the federal government stimulus in the quarter is alarming and casts further doubt on the underlying strength in the economy as federal stimululs abates going into next year. Our assumption of 1%-3% GDP growth in the fourth quarter will need strong contributions in both consumer and business fixed investment from the revised third quarter levels. We detect an improved level of retail sales in the quarter but  will need to see sales results of “Black Friday” to see if that is true. A disappointment in this weekend’s sales will cause a shift in outlook for both the economy and particularly the capital markets which have been seeing the glass “half full” in November despite the warning signs in consumer sentiment, new home sales and continued high levels of unemployment. It is noteworthy that the market gains in November have been accompanied by low levels of trading volume, an ominous sign for sustained capital market gains.

In our previous website and blog articles on the preliminary third quarter GDP, we remained skeptical of the durability of the third quarter gains and said we would be watching fourth quarter economic data closely for future direction. With the downward revision in third quarter numbers, we will be even more vigilant to see if this economic recovery has “legs”.
Best wishes for a Happy Thanksgiving holiday and stay tuned.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Today’s Economic Landscape and What’s on the Other Side

Morris Segall      2009 economy, business, business landscape, climate, crisis, debt, economic, future trends, globalization, recession, slowdown, strategy, trends, unemployment

We recently updated our presentation on today’s economic landscape and what’s on the other side with some fresh data.  We hope you continue to find value in our slides:

I’m Mad As Hell (Part 4): Declining Economy Causes Spiraling Stress

Morris Segall      declining economy, economics, future trends, public unrest, recession, stress

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series.  Part two discussed the first four trends and developments.  Part three discussed public anger.  Today’s entry, part four, will discuss the ramifications of an even more insidious by-product of the recession: stress.

In addition to anger, the American public is emotionally stressed and physically debilitated.

After experiencing the heady and seemingly inexorable rise in consumer net worth and incomes from the expanding economy, rising stock markets and most importantly, the outlandish increase in real estate values over the 2003-2006 periods, the American consumer has seen his world literally come crashing down since the second half of 2007. It is estimated that the declines in housing values and the stock markets together over the last 5 quarters is more than $15 trillion or an entire year’s GDP.  As a result, the American consumer that exuded great confidence and risk tolerance has become stricken with fear.

In the article, “The Fed’s Conundrum,” April 5, 2007, we commented on what we felt was an increase in the fear factor for consumers, which was going to suppress consumer spending and appetite for risk, going forward. We based this on the increase in inflation at the time and the accelerating decline in the housing cycle underway, leading to increased mortgage foreclosures. In addition, as government statistics would later prove, job creation was peaking that spring.

Fear is something the American public doesn’t exhibit very often.  The post war period has been one of economic growth and a rising standard of living for Americans. To be sure, the American economy has experienced periodic and sometimes severe recessions, but they have been surpassed by longer and stronger growth periods.

Until this decade. The current recession is the second major economic downturn since 2000 and this recession is by far the most damaging and most pervasive in financial and social terms since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The loss of homes, jobs, net worth, financial security and retirement security has caused the American consumer to doubt his ability to survive and to doubt the American capitalist economic model.

In the current economic environment, Americans are full of worry.  A March 4, 2009 article in Advertising Age noted that prescriptions for sleeping pills and anti-depressants had escalated 7% and 15%, respectively, in 2008 despite a cutback in marketing for such drugs by pharmaceutical companies.

Based on the worsening economic climate in the first half of 2009, we would expect such numbers to increase. In the same Advertising Age article a poll by the National Sleep Foundation released on March 2, 2009, found over 30% of respondents said they are “losing sleep over the economy and their own financial situation”. The National Sleep Foundation Poll found an increase in sleeplessness and anxiety is leading to an increase in depression and a decrease in efficiency and productivity on the job.

Regional and local data particularly in cities hard hit by the recession indicate a dramatic increase in suicides, suicide attempts and calls to suicide hot lines. This emotional stress is taking its toll on the overall physical health of the country. We believe doctor visits for emotional or stress related physical illnesses have increased as well as absenteeism from work. The result is a significant increase in medical care costs for doctor visits and prescriptions as well as a decrease in overall worker productivity. In such an environment, people are more nervous and short-tempered, which often leads to increased aggressive behavior including violence. Witness the increase in mass shootings in the U.S. and shockingly in Europe as overstressed individuals react to the loss of their jobs and declines in their financial conditions. In addition, consumer outlooks for the future are negative.

Be sure to subscribe to receive part 5 in this series.

I’m Mad As Hell (Part 2)

Morris Segall      economics, economy, future trends, international, macro, micro, monetary policy, political, social, social unrest

In a recent article published March 23 for SPGTrend.com subscribers, we examined the social and political toll of the current recession and their longer term impacts on the U.S and overseas economies.  Over the course of several blog posts, we will take you through the content of this piece and put what we’re going through into context.

In part one, we outlined an introduction for this series.  Part two will discuss the first four trends and developments that are unfolding:

1.       Social unrest in Russia, Eastern and Western Europe as rising unemployment and cutbacks in domestic government spending programs and consumer incomes. Of particular note are the

street demonstrations and strikes in Western Europe where we have not seen this type of reaction to economic distress since the Great Depression of the 1930′s. It speaks volumes about the level of angst and anger among foreign workers and consumers.

2.       This social unrest is creating political change. Governments in Latvia and Iceland have already collapsed and there is increasing pressure on the governments in Ireland, France and Great Britain to stop the bleeding in those economies. Even in Russia, discontent among the populace is being aimed at the current government, which had been quite popular last year.

3.        Worker protests abroad are leading to increased calls for expulsion of immigrant workers and protectionist measurers to protect domestic jobs and companies. Globalization has now become very unpopular in the advanced industrialized countries of Western Europe as they face the same erosion of their industrial base as we have suffered over the past decade.    There have been attacks on immigrant workers in Western Europe and Russia as frustrated and angry citizens fight for the shrinking job markets in their countries. In short, we see a movement to the political right as nationalist feelings replace the internationalist perspectives previously held overseas. This does not augur well for the future of the European Union and free trade policies.

4.       The rise in protectionism is also occurring here in the U.S. as shown by the recent rescission of long haul trucking privileges to Mexican companies that were hauling freight into the U.S. from Mexico. That freight must now be transported from the border by U.S. firms. Mexico responded by putting tariffs on a list of U.S. imports. This backlash against free trade agreements is putting pressure on government leaders who still champion globalization as desirable for U.S. economic growth. Policymakers in Washington and Fortune 500 companies that manufacture and trade overseas are finding themselves at odds with workers and consumers who are losing their jobs to lower cost foreign labor. With unemployment in this country effectively at 9% and going higher, American workers are “mad as hell and aren’t going to take it anymore”. Labor unions helped elect Barack Obama. They expect “payback”.  Importantly, Democrats in Congress and the President himself have pledged to re-evaluate America’s free trade agreements and policy. We expect some “pullback” from the liberal free trade policies of the last decade.

Next up, we’ll outline additional trends and provide context for where all of this is heading.  Don’t forget to subscribe to our blog to get the rest of this series.

Today’s Business Landscape And What’s On The Other Side

Morris Segall      business, business landscape, economics, economy, future trends, macro, micro, trends