SPG Trend Advisors Blog

Ben Bernanke appears to be fighting for his life before Congress where several members from both major parties and one of the independents in the Senate are rejecting his reappointment as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board for a second four year term.  The opponents of his reappointment blame Mr. Bernanke for aiding and abetting the excesses in the financial system that resulted in its meltdown and taxpayer bailouts of many of its institutions. In their zeal to lash out at the stewards of fiscal and monetary policy during the financial crisis of the past two years, the critics of Ben Bernanke fail to include one of the most culpable parties to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and that is Congress itself. From the enactment of the Bank Holding Company Act in 1956 and its subsequent amendments which allowed banks to buy non bank financial entities outside of the supervision of the Federal Reserve System, to the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act which had separated the commercial and non-commercial banking activities of banks in 1999, to the lax oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, federally chartered institutions that were the backbone of mortgage securitizations and transactions which fed the lending bubble. For over 40 years the Congress has consistently enacted legislation that enabled banks and other lenders to engage in high risk activities OUTSIDE of the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. So when the Fed complained that it was losing control of the financial system, Congress did nothing.

In our website article of December 7, 2007, “The Treasury Plan: Is This the Solution?“  we outlined our skepticism of the success of the Treasury plan of then Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, to effectively “dance around” the mortgage crisis by adjusting mortgage rates and terms in the hope of forestalling the inevitable losses from mortgage defaults. It was not until March, 2008 that the Federal Reserve forcefully attacked the loan loss problem by swapping Treasury paper for the problem debt held by mortgage lenders. The Fed subsequently expanded Discount Window facilities to both commercial and for the fist time, non-commercial banks like investment banks and brokerage firms so these firms could have liquidity. In fact in our ongoing economic presentations such as the ones  posted on our blog and website,  there is an entire section of slides and commentary entitled “The Government”s Response” to the severe credit crisis. It shows the leadership of the Fed in increasing the money supply, reducing interest rates and expanding its own balance sheet by purchasing the “toxic” assets of the banking system to provide it with liquidity necessary to keep the system afloat.  By most objective scutiny of the Federal Government’s handling of the credit crisis, including our own jaundiced view, if there is a hero in this debacle, it is Ben Bernanke who literally pulled out all the stops to keep the financial system in this country from totally collapsing, particularly after Henry Paulson triggered a system panic by allowing Lehman Bros. to fail. We may not have liked the bailouts of many of these instituions but as we have stated in prior commentaries, the country runs on credit and letting the banking system fail was just not an option.

If one wants to point a finger at the Fed for allowing the credit bubble to build, it needs to be pointed at Alan Greenspan who instead of musing on the illogical low level of interest rates in 2004-05 in the face of the real estate boom should have raised interest rates and loan reserve and capital requirements to slow the creation of credit. Upon succeeding Greenspan in January, 2006 Ben Bernanke’ s Fed started raising interest rates through the spring and into the summer of that year and held those higher rates until the recession began in late 2007.

We and other observers believe Ben Bernanke will be reappointed to another term after this current thrashing. He better be. A rejection of Ben Bernanke AND an ill advised replacing of the Federal Reserve as the nation’s principal regulator of monetary policy and the financial system, would create a loss of confidence in foreign bankers, creditors and traders and would depress our bond markets and exacerbate an already “free falling” U.S. dollar. The President needs to show leadership on this issue and strongly reaffirm his support for the reappointment of Ben Bernanke and not let Congress make him the “goat” of the recession. If Congress wants to assess blame for the financial mess, they should begin by looking in the mirror.

Morris R. Segall, CFA, CIC

Economic Trends Ben Bernanke, business landscape, Capital Markets, credit crisis, economics, economy, government, obama, treasury, trends, unemployment

As I feared from the beginning, the future of President Obama’s proposals were going to be in the hands of conservative or “Blue Dog” Democrats largely from the south, west and midwest. Their opposition to the high costs of the plan and a large federal presence in the system was going to be the defeat of the President’s program, rather than the expected “knee jerk” Republican opposition. The Republicans are now a marginal party lacking numbers and influence in the Congress to pass or defeat any legislation. It now appears the “Blue Dogs” will win out and “water down” the President’s plan to the point where it will be largely a failure in terms of progressive healthcare reform. It will eliminate a federal entity to offer insurance in competition to the private insurance industry. It will exempt thousands of so called small businesses, even those with payrolls of $500,000. It will also extract higher health insurance premiums on low-middle income wage earners. And most egregiously, push more of the increased Medicaid burden on the states who are already facing massive budget deficits and have no money to pay for anything. As a result of the “Blue Dog” opposition, in conjunction with the negative statements from the Republicans and the propaganda from the healthcare industry, popular support for the President’s program has been seriously eroded and the fact that Congress will adjourn for the month of August without passing healthcare reform legislation will give the President’s opponents an entire month to erode popular support further and “gut” the pending bills in committees even more.

I fear the final result will be little if any real healthcare reform; increased premiums for insured’s, particularly if private insurance firms have to accept less healthy members; and a continued increase in uninsured people as businesses are exempt from providing mandatory healthcare coverage. The winners will be the insurance and pharmaceutical industries who will have “dodged” a bullet for massive healthcare overhaul and reform. The costs to them will be a fraction of what the President’s program would have cost them and they will make it up by charging higher prices to the public. The losers will be the public who will continue to pay more for an unworkable system and doctors who will get paid less in an effort to control healthcare costs. By the way, the cost saving from the current compromise plan agreed to by the Democrats in the House is  $100 billion, the amount we sunk into General Motors and Chrysler in a futile attempt to save them from bankruptcy. As I said in my previous piece, it would appear we are more prone to spending billions saving corporate America than insuring the health of the American public.

The Democratic Party offered the American public comprehensive healthcare reform in the last two elections and the American public gave the Democratic Party the electoral majority they needed to get it done. It appears the Democrats decided that was a promise they are not willing to keep.

Morris R. Segall

Recommended reading:

Turning the Corner: GDP, Housing and Cash for Clunkers

An Open Letter to Congress

—–

Economic Trends Blue Dog Democrats, democrats, economics, economy, healthcare plan, healthcare reform, obama, republicans

Dear members of Congress,

I am writing to you regarding the current debate on President Obama’s national healthcare plan. As you may know I head an economic and capital markets research and consulting firm. My firm and our affiliate, Sage Policy Group, engage in economic and public policy analysis and ideas. Healthcare is one of several policy issues we have and are currently studying.

I have been involved in either administering or participating in private sector insurance programs for most of my 25 year corporate career. More recently, I have had to engage both the public insurance program of Medicare and the private hospital and insurance industry as a result of chronically ill parents who are both incapacitated. As a result, I have developed a keen understanding and awareness of the mortally broken and dysfunctional healthcare system currently in place in our country. After opposing the Clinton healthcare plan over 10 years ago I have come to the realization that comprehensive and affordable healthcare for most Americans must be built around a Federal entity.

The present system based on the private insurance and drug industries has not contained healthcare costs and has not increased the number of insured Americans. To the contrary, medical insurance costs are skyrocketing, even in the midst of this great recession. Many businesses report medical insurance plan increases in 2008 and 2009 well in excess of 20% and employees in those plans are facing higher deductibles and increased insurance premium and co-insurance payments, in some cases of nearly 50%. This at a time when American workers are facing historic unemployment and reduced “take home” pay from wage and salary reductions and fewer hours worked. Seniors on Medicare are now facing exorbitant costs for required drugs as they hit the “doughnut” hole in prescription drug coverage. While the costs of medical insurance and drugs go up, the reimbursements to doctors and hospitals are being reduced causing doctors to either leave practice or refuse to accept private insurance and Medicare patients. The increase in uninsured Americans forces them to seek medical treatment at hospital emergency rooms overwhelming those facilities. Likewise the increase in our aging population is now overwhelming acute care hospitals and nursing home facilities that are facing chronic shortages of trained personnel to care for an increasingly sick patient population. And the costs of hospitalization and nursing home care are crushing. Hospital and related services costs have increased nearly 8% in the six months ended this past May according to the Government’s CPI report.

So after decades of trying to fix America’s healthcare system and control escalating costs what is wrong? What’s wrong is we are asking FOR PROFIT companies that are primarily focused on increasing earnings and shareholder value and paying bonuses to its senior managers for doing so, to make less money by reducing its prices and accepting less than totally healthy insured’s that will “eat” into their profits. Critics of national healthcare raise the alarms of out of control costs, rationed and inefficient treatment in a federal system. Healthcare is already rationed if you are not on a corporate healthcare plan and if you have the misfortune of going to an emergency room and waiting for a physician for up to 12 hours, you will see firsthand the inefficiency of healthcare in today’s environment. This system is broken and will collapse entirely under the weight of the impending case load of the baby boomers. There are national crises that inure properly to the Federal government for solution.

It is now time to recognize the failures of the present system and move boldly toward a federal government health insurance program offering and administering, preferably under a single payor system, comprehensive, diagnostic and wellness programs to all Americans. It is also time to rectify the injustice in the Medicare prescription drug program and eliminate the so called “doughnut hole” in prescription drug coverage for seniors that forces many seniors to either skip their medications or have to choose between their medications and other necessities. But the cost of such a comprehensive federal program you say. How will we pay for it? What will it do to the federal deficit? How can it be run efficiently with some cost effectiveness?

No one is more cognizant of the erosion of U.S. finances than we. We have been warning our clients and audiences since last September when we first raised the specter of the long term cost to our currency and balance sheet from the huge bailout spending programs to resuscitate our economy. Now on top of that spending are ambitious spending programs of the President for energy independence, healthcare and education. The costs of huge federal deficits which we have projected in excess of $2 trillion this fiscal year and nearly that much in fiscal 2010 are already being felt in the currency and bond markets. The costs of such deficits will have to be borne by all of us, consumers and business, in the form of higher taxes and fees. We will also have to be creative in charging for increased government services on a means testing basis including higher co-payment terms for health insurance for those that can afford it. And don’t let the recent spate of propaganda from some medical authorities convince you there are no healthcare cost savings from wellness programs. You and I both know that just isn’t so.

We believe the American public has endorsed an increased federal presence in their lives with the election of a Democratic Congress in 2006 and the sweeping victory of President Obama in 2008 on a populist platform. We believe Americans are willing to pay higher taxes for increased government services and assistance in healthcare, education and energy which are draining middle class incomes and threaten our standard of living. If the U.S. government can spend billions on bailing out GM, AIG, credit card, banks, investment and insurance firms, what is our economic future and public health worth?  Therefore, I ask you to support the President’s proposal for a strong, comprehensive federal insurance program including a payor system. By the way, such a program would be an enormous help to the thousands of unemployed white collar managers, professionals, and administrators who have been especially hard hit in this recession. You might look at a federal health insurance program as the equivalent of the WPA program under President Roosevelt in terms of putting people back to work and helping to resuscitate the economy. Furthermore, this pool of highly experienced managers and professionals is one of the reasons I believe you can implement a large federal healthcare program successfully.

Sincerely,

Morris R. Segall

President

msegall@spgtrend.com

Economic Trends government, healthcare, healthcare plan, insurance, medical insurance, Medicare, obama

Western nations are protesting the so called peace deal reached over last weekend between the Pakistani government and the Taliban and Al Queda forces occupying the Swat Valley in northwest Pakistan. Under the agreement, the anti-democratic forces will be allowed to govern their territory using Islamic law. This agreement essentially cedes this territory to extremist elements within the country. We called attention to this very unfavorable development in our website article, “Setback in War on Terror“, May 28, 2008 and warned this would undermine the democratic central government in Pakistan and our war against the Taliban in Afghanistan. This additional capitulation to Islamic extremists by the Pakistani government will only hasten its downfall. The West as usual has reacted with too little too late. This additional secession of territory from central government control is adding to the power base of Islamic extremists within Pakistan that will foster additional anti-democratic activity against the central government and bolster the Taliban resistance against NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Since November, 2007 we have written a number of articles warning of the increasing threat of anti-democratic actions against the government of Pakistan that would undermine it and left unchecked could topple it. The events of last weekend are further evidence of the weakness of the Pakistani government. The logical course of events from here is a period of cessation of violence while the anti-democratic forces within Pakistan consolidate their gains and prepare for further action against a visibly weak government. As the strength of the extremists grow it will influence and coerce the population AND the military to cooperate with them against the government. The West is not prepared to subdue these extremist elements with force and increasingly neither is the Pakistani military. So what is to stop these elements from continuing to expand their influence and territorial control within Pakistan? Not much. There does not appear to be grass roots sentiment among the Pakistani public to repulse the anti-democratic elements so there is no pressure from within Pakistan for the government to take a harsher stance towards the Islamic militants. Unless pro democracy elements within the Pakistani military assert themselves and dictate a change in military policy and actions against what must be called rebel elements against the elected central government in Pakistan, the country may be doomed to an Islamic fundamentalist takeover. This nightmare scenario is only now awakening a public response from democratic governments outside Pakistan.

It will be interesting to see how the new Obama administration deals with this threat. The fall of Pakistan would represent a greater geo-political disaster than the loss of Iraq and Afghanistan combined. It would place nuclear weapons in the hands of Islamic extremists. It would spell defeat in Afghanistan. It would threaten India which has already been attacked by Islamic extremists from Pakistan (See our blog article, “And Now It’s India“, January 21, 2009) and create an Islamic extremist power bloc from Syria to the Indian subcontinent. Bolstered by such a power bloc, Lebanon would also fall to Hezbollah and Israel would find itself arrayed against insurmountable forces. The threat of nuclear war in the region would be heightened. This will provide the real foreign policy strategic test of the Obama administration and we should not underestimate its seriousness.

Morris R. Segall

Economic Trends Afghanistan, hezbollah, India, Iraq, obama, protest, syria

I’ve said publicly in the past that that I thought the cost of rescuing the banking system and the economy would easily be $2 trillion. It now looks like the Obama administration has a $700 billion stimulus package in the works on top of the current bailout package and the cost of bailing out banks and Wall St. so far.

If the $700 billion price tag of the Obama program is true, we are there.

This will likely not be the end and we could be looking at more than $2 trillion before this is all over. The impact on the Federal budget deficits and national debt will be enormous.

It also appears a major public works/infrastructure program will be part of the stimulus program. I have also been quoted by the Philadelphia Inquirer that I did not believe such a program will have the desired effect the government assumes. In an economy where more unemployed are white collar workers and state and local governments are slashing transportation and infrastructure programs, it is dubious the federal public works spending will have the multiplier stimulus impact.

We really need to have a whole new approach to this economy that is nothing like the historic post-war economy we have grown up with. Look what is happening to auto dealerships as a result of the demise of the big 3 auto makers. Historic solutions to recessions have already not worked, i.e. lowering interest rates alone. Bailing out sick companies is not the answer. Uncapped public spending to bail out companies will cost us dearly down the road.

The government’s strategy must be to put consumers back on their feet.  If the government wants to help consumers get back on their feet, they need to find jobs publicly or in the private sector for all of the white collar workers from finance, trade, business services, etc. that are chronically unemployed and are not finding ready re-employment.

Economic Trends bailout, banking system, obama