The June Employment Report: Now we are getting pessimistic

Morris Segall      business spending, Capital Markets, consumer sentiment, consumer spending, debt default, deficit reduction, democrats, Economic Growth, economic recovery, future trends, inflation, job creation, June employment, obama, recession, Republican Party

Today’s employment report for the month of June is unequivocally a blow to expectations that May’s weak report was an aberration.  Instead of rebounding from May results, the June report deteriorated in virtually all key aspects  of employment. Nonfarm payrolls increased by a neglible 18,000 jobs, the weakest level of job growth in nine months. To make matters worse, the Labor Department revised downward its previous readings on job creation in April and May by a combined 41,000 jobs, including a 29,000 job reduction in May to 25,000 from an already weak level of 54,000 jobs. The June report and the April-May revisions reveal a virtual absence of job creation since April. Of the 18,000 jobs created in June, 57,000 were created in the private sector, offset by a reduction of 39,000 jobs in federal, state and local governments. Of the 57,000 private sector jobs the vast bulk of these, (34,000),  were in the Leisure and Hospitality sector- low paying, seasonal and tenuous given its sensitivity to the economy. According to the Household survey, the unemployment rate reached a year to date high of 9.2% in June despite a contraction in the labor force of over 270,000 from May levels. In addition, the June Household survey showed an increase of 173,000 in the number of unemployed workers and an increase of nearly 450,000 persons not in the labor force. Other statistics from the June monthly report include: a recessionary employment/population ratio of 58.2%; a $.01 decrease in average hourly earnings resulting in no increase in average hourly earnings since April; a decrease in the average workweek and factory overtime; an increase of 100,000 in the number of discouraged workers from May to nearly 1 million persons; an overall increase of 474,000 in those categorized as marginally attached to the labor force from May to a level of 2.7 million people; and an increase of over 400,000 from May in the number of unemployed less than 5 weeks to over 3 million persons. In June, the percentage of workers unemployed, those marginally attached to the labor force and those working part time because they can’t find full time work amounted to over 16%, the highest level this year. Two years after the recession ended, these numbers are unprecedented in post-war economic recoveries.

In our June 7th website article on May unemployment data, we concluded that the May data had been suppressed by the severe storms in the south and mid-west in April and May and the supply dislocations in Japan. We saw reassuring data in the May report that encouraged us to believe we were not on the verge of a double dip recession. Unfortunately, the June report contained none of those positives and should be relatively unimpeded by exogenous events. We believe  the June data confirms our fears that the business sector has retrenched in its spending since March, insecure in the outlook for consumer and customer end demand given the high levels of inflation and pressure on incomes and profit margins and deteriorating economic conditions in major markets overseas. This is confirmed in the underlying weakness in the June ISM manufacturing survey ( See our website article on the June Manufacturing Survey), and the weakness in the June ISM non-manufacturing survey, both released earlier this week. This retrenchment now appears to include a reduction in hiring.

This business spending retrenchment will have enormous implications for economic growth for the remainder of this year and into next if not reversed. An economy that does not provide job growth cannot grow. We have long focused on business and consumer spending as the drivers of economic recovery in the absence of contributions from housing and the government sector. Business retrenchment in spending and hiring will remove both of those drivers from the economy. The absence of private sector job creation will soon be reflected in reduced consumer sentiment and spending. Reduced consumer spending will slow business sales and pressure corporate profits causing businesses to retrench further. The net result is an economy that does not grow and one that could easily fall back into recession. We commented in our last website article how important the June employment report would be for the future direction of our economy. With the June numbers showing such employment weakness, we are now pessimistic the second half of this year will show renewed economic growth and the outlook for 2012 has become decidedly less sanguine. We expect to revise downward our expectations for GDP growth for this year to the bottom of our 2%-3% range and we may have to reduce our projections further if current economic trends persist.

We expect the weak June employment data to complicate if not preclude an agreement on raising the nation’s debt ceiling. The weakness of the June report will, in our opinion, harden the resolve of Republicans to reject revenue raising measures advocated by the President. The same employment weakness will, in our opinion, also strengthen the resolve of Democrats to avoid stringent federal spending cuts, particularly in entitlement programs. The current weakness in the economy will widen the ideological chasm between the political parties. Thus, we are not optimistic a far reaching deficit reduction program will be reached in the next two weeks. Rather we now believe a stopgap measure to avoid government default, possibly through the end of the current fiscal year, will be the only agreement that can be fashioned.

Clearly these events and the current economic environment are not conducive to stock market appreciation. In view of the recent rally in stock prices at the end of June and the first week in July, we believe the equity markets have increased downside risk and less upside potential. We would advise a more defensive and risk averse capital market strategy in light of present circumstances.

Morris R. Segall

Republicans win in Massachusetts: The vote heard “round the world”

Morris Segall      Democratic Party, democrats, economy, Election, government, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Senate, political, politics, President Obama, Republican Party, republicans, Scott Brown, Ted Kennedy

Tuesday’s  stunning victory in Massachusetts by Republican Scott Brown to fill the Senate seat of the late Ted Kennedy is undeniable evidence of the failure of the Democratic Party and President Obama to capitalize on their voter mandate in 2008. In what should have been a year of great accomplishment with passage of landmark legislation in healthcare, the environment and economic reform the President marks his inaugural anniversary with no great success in his domestic agenda and his party losing its super majority in the Senate. Coupled with recent Republican victories in gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia and the retirement of several leading Democrats in the Senate, the Democratic Party is firmly on the defensive with low voter approval ratings and the object of intense voter anger. We have been commenting on building voter anger in our website articles (See “Long Term Outlook“, October 8, 2006, “The Election“, November 17, 2008 and “I am Mad as Hell…”, March 23, 2009) and it has now reached a fever pitch exacerbated by the severe recession. We repeat the mantra we have stated since 2006, “an angry electorate is an unpredictable electorate”.  A more detailed review and analysis of the domestic political environment and its implications will be covered in an upcoming website article. For now, we make the following observations:

1. The President must take responsibility for his party’s decline and his program failures. The President is an eloquent speaker but he does not follow the speeches with forceful actions. We commented in our July and August blog articles on the failure of the President’s healthcare initiative BECAUSE of splits within the Democratic Party. With all of the political capital expended by the President on healthcare, his failure to unify his own party and rally public support on this issue have been fatal. The election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts and the decline in public approval have made the President’s healthcare initiative all but dead.

2. Likewise, the loss of the Massachusetts Senate seat will now slow if not halt the President’s initiatives on carbon taxation, immigration, financial system regulation and other major agenda items that encompass higher taxes and increased federal government presence.

3. The anger in the electorate and the failures of the President and the Democratic Party have now resurrected the Republican opposition and make them a credible threat to unseat Democrats in this year’s Congressional elections. Faced with public anger and reelection, Democrats in Congress will be less inclined to support the President. Significant losses by the Democrats in the House and Senate will likely result in legislative gridlock for the remainder of President Obama’s term. The President would increasingly look like a one term president. This will prevent solutions to the major socio-economic issues we face in the next decade and cloud our longer term economic outlook. This will however alleviate increased regulation of business and provide a more benign environment for the stock market in the shorter term.

4. This latest political setback for President Obama will not go unnoticed overseas. A president already viewed as weak and unsuccessful overseas (See our recent website article, “The Obama Foreign Policy“, January 7, 2010), will be weakened further if he cannot control his own political party and win the public debates on domestic policy.  It will be harder to get agreements from allies and concessions from adversaries particularly if the president looks like a one termer.

Tuesday’s Senate election in Massachusetts has altered the domestic political landscape and thus the economic outlook for the next two years. Its repercussions will be felt not only here in the U.S. but around the world as well.

Morris R. Segall