The Super Committee fails: Now What?

Morris Segall      Bush tax cuts, consumer spending, democrats, Economic Growth, economic outlook, employment, eroding middle class, future trends, mandatory federal spending cutbacks, military spending, public education impairment, republicans, U.S. credit rating downgrade, U.S. economic and military superiority

Yesterday’s announcement that the Bipartisan Congressional Committee, charged with formulating a long term deficit reduction plan, could not come to an agreement on such a plan was anti-climatic. It had been rumored for weeks that the members of the committee were far apart on critical issues and by this past weekend, it was apparent no agreement was going to be reached. We had long been skeptical this committee was going to succeed (See our blog video of October 7) but we felt there was a chance statesmanship would triumph over politics at the eleventh hour. We were wrong. We have commented since last summer’s near disastrous debt limit negotiations that the ideological divide between Republicans and Democrats is so wide that the parties are incapable of bridging the gap, even when the well being of the nation is at stake. It will reside in America’s voters in next year’s election to decide this country’s long term public and fiscal policy by electing a President and Congress of one political party or the other. A split vote that results in continued divided government in Washington will be a formula for economic and social disaster.

In the meantime, Congress must fund the government past next month and decide if it will extend last year’s tax breaks via a reduced payroll tax on wage earners and extended benefits to this nation’s chronic number of long term unemployed. In the present partisan atmosphere in Washington, none of these important issues can be counted as certain of passage. Failure to pass any of these items will certainly diminish the economic outlook for next year at the least, and potentially plunge this country into economic chaos at the worst, if the government is shutdown for lack of funding.

Beyond the immediate issues affecting the economy for next year are the prospects of mandatory federal budget cutbacks and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013 as a result of the failure of the “Super Committee” to fashion a long term deficit reduction package. The combination of increased taxes and federal government spending cuts will result in higher taxes, particularly on the already stressed middle class, and significant reductions in federal assistance in vital areas such as education, again disproportionately affecting middle and lower income sectors of our economy. At the same time, mandatory federal spending reductions will fall heavily on the Defense Department causing drastic cuts vital to our national defense while our strategic enemies are increasing their defense spending and closing the gap on our technological superiority. It is this technological superiority, through necessary research and development, that allows us to field a world class military with fewer numbers than our adversaries. Oh and by the way, defense spending cutbacks of approximately $500 billion over the next ten years are estimated to cost approximately 1 million defense related jobs according to estimates by the Defense Department.

The sum of such fiscal developments, we believe, will be a low level of economic growth on an extended basis from suppressed consumer income and spending and continued high levels of unemployment. Erosion of our public education system to the detriment of a future generation of students and impairing our ability to compete in the world economy. This combination may well result in the creation of a burgeoning number of low income earners replacing what has historically been a growing and thriving American middle class. The disparity between the “haves” and “have nots” will reach historic proportions threatening the future social, economic and military superiority of the U.S. Lastly, there is no guarantee that such mandatory spending reductions will stave off a further lowering of our credit rating. Indeed, we expect the rating agencies will be taking an unfavorable opinion of our economic prospects in the near term. Lower spending matched by lower tax receipts may not result in the improved federal fiscal situation necessary to maintain our AAA credit rating. In short, absent a robust economic recovery, hallmarked by substantial job and income growth, the future social and economic outlooks for this country are not encouraging.

Morris R. Segall

The Budget Wars: Now beginning

Morris Segall      bailout, budget deficits, democrats, financial Armageddon, fiscal wars, national debt, national economic philosophy, new fiscal discipline, obama, politics, republicans, U.S. government default, U.S. government shutdown

Last week’s melodrama leading up to the eleventh hour avoidance of a Federal government shutdown is just the beginning of the new fiscal wars over the U.S. budget for this fiscal year and beyond. The discussion of U.S. fiscal policy has now turned from stimulus, bailouts and economic recovery to debt reduction and redefining the role of the Federal government in the economy. Starting with the release of the Republican led House Budget Committee’s aggressive plan for deficit reduction, followed by steadfast demands for major reductions in federal spending  to avoid the government shutdown, the Republican party has now shaped and defined the fiscal discussion and taken the lead from the President and the Democrats in Washington. The President, on the defensive, will reveal tomorrow evening his plan for reducing projected federal deficits going forward and lowering the level of the national debt as a percentage of our GDP.

In arriving at their compromise last week on nearly $39 billion in spending cuts for this fiscal year, the President was fortunate in being able to utilize a number of “one time” program reductions, cost cuts already approved by Congress and unused funds from previously adopted appropriations. This “low hanging fruit” may be as much as $20 billion of the $38.5 billion compromise. The President and the Democrats in Congress will not be so fortunate going forward. The President knows he must propose a credible deficit reduction program in an attempt to get Republican cooperation in raising the federal debt ceiling by early May. Such a plan will likely include tax increases as well as significant spending reductions. The President and his party will try to salvage as much of their fiscal and social agenda as possible.

Given the strong philosophical differences between the parties, we believe the President’s submission tomorrow evening will be rejected as insufficient and inclusive of unwelcome taxes by Republican hard liners in the House of Representatives. Another period of gamesmanship between the Republicans in the House and the President and the Democratically controlled Senate will ensue between now and early May, when the government will run out of money, to attempt a budget compromise and avoid a federal government default. The parties will use this period to blame each other for taking the country to financial Armageddon. We are optimistic neither party want to be held responsible for that and last minute concessions will avert disaster.

We have long warned of deteriorating federal finances, long before the recent recession, and been critical of the burgeoning federal debt, unsuccessful fiscal “ bailout” and excess liquidity programs to the extent we have been steadfastly pessimistic in regards to the long term U.S. financial and capital markets outlooks. We are in the process of examining the federal financial situation and the proposed solutions in an upcoming website article. However, the current chain of events and resulting dialogue represents a sea change in our national economic thinking and philosophy. The potential economic changes resulting from a new fiscal discipline in Washington will have profound impacts on all of us, our children and grandchildren.

Morris R. Segall

Republicans win in Massachusetts: The vote heard “round the world”

Morris Segall      Democratic Party, democrats, economy, Election, government, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Senate, political, politics, President Obama, Republican Party, republicans, Scott Brown, Ted Kennedy

Tuesday’s  stunning victory in Massachusetts by Republican Scott Brown to fill the Senate seat of the late Ted Kennedy is undeniable evidence of the failure of the Democratic Party and President Obama to capitalize on their voter mandate in 2008. In what should have been a year of great accomplishment with passage of landmark legislation in healthcare, the environment and economic reform the President marks his inaugural anniversary with no great success in his domestic agenda and his party losing its super majority in the Senate. Coupled with recent Republican victories in gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia and the retirement of several leading Democrats in the Senate, the Democratic Party is firmly on the defensive with low voter approval ratings and the object of intense voter anger. We have been commenting on building voter anger in our website articles (See “Long Term Outlook“, October 8, 2006, “The Election“, November 17, 2008 and “I am Mad as Hell…”, March 23, 2009) and it has now reached a fever pitch exacerbated by the severe recession. We repeat the mantra we have stated since 2006, “an angry electorate is an unpredictable electorate”.  A more detailed review and analysis of the domestic political environment and its implications will be covered in an upcoming website article. For now, we make the following observations:

1. The President must take responsibility for his party’s decline and his program failures. The President is an eloquent speaker but he does not follow the speeches with forceful actions. We commented in our July and August blog articles on the failure of the President’s healthcare initiative BECAUSE of splits within the Democratic Party. With all of the political capital expended by the President on healthcare, his failure to unify his own party and rally public support on this issue have been fatal. The election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts and the decline in public approval have made the President’s healthcare initiative all but dead.

2. Likewise, the loss of the Massachusetts Senate seat will now slow if not halt the President’s initiatives on carbon taxation, immigration, financial system regulation and other major agenda items that encompass higher taxes and increased federal government presence.

3. The anger in the electorate and the failures of the President and the Democratic Party have now resurrected the Republican opposition and make them a credible threat to unseat Democrats in this year’s Congressional elections. Faced with public anger and reelection, Democrats in Congress will be less inclined to support the President. Significant losses by the Democrats in the House and Senate will likely result in legislative gridlock for the remainder of President Obama’s term. The President would increasingly look like a one term president. This will prevent solutions to the major socio-economic issues we face in the next decade and cloud our longer term economic outlook. This will however alleviate increased regulation of business and provide a more benign environment for the stock market in the shorter term.

4. This latest political setback for President Obama will not go unnoticed overseas. A president already viewed as weak and unsuccessful overseas (See our recent website article, “The Obama Foreign Policy“, January 7, 2010), will be weakened further if he cannot control his own political party and win the public debates on domestic policy.  It will be harder to get agreements from allies and concessions from adversaries particularly if the president looks like a one termer.

Tuesday’s Senate election in Massachusetts has altered the domestic political landscape and thus the economic outlook for the next two years. Its repercussions will be felt not only here in the U.S. but around the world as well.

Morris R. Segall

Healthcare Reform and the Democrats: We have seen the enemy and they are us!

Morris Segall      Blue Dog Democrats, democrats, economics, economy, healthcare plan, healthcare reform, obama, republicans

As I feared from the beginning, the future of President Obama’s proposals were going to be in the hands of conservative or “Blue Dog” Democrats largely from the south, west and midwest. Their opposition to the high costs of the plan and a large federal presence in the system was going to be the defeat of the President’s program, rather than the expected “knee jerk” Republican opposition. The Republicans are now a marginal party lacking numbers and influence in the Congress to pass or defeat any legislation. It now appears the “Blue Dogs” will win out and “water down” the President’s plan to the point where it will be largely a failure in terms of progressive healthcare reform. It will eliminate a federal entity to offer insurance in competition to the private insurance industry. It will exempt thousands of so called small businesses, even those with payrolls of $500,000. It will also extract higher health insurance premiums on low-middle income wage earners. And most egregiously, push more of the increased Medicaid burden on the states who are already facing massive budget deficits and have no money to pay for anything. As a result of the “Blue Dog” opposition, in conjunction with the negative statements from the Republicans and the propaganda from the healthcare industry, popular support for the President’s program has been seriously eroded and the fact that Congress will adjourn for the month of August without passing healthcare reform legislation will give the President’s opponents an entire month to erode popular support further and “gut” the pending bills in committees even more.

I fear the final result will be little if any real healthcare reform; increased premiums for insured’s, particularly if private insurance firms have to accept less healthy members; and a continued increase in uninsured people as businesses are exempt from providing mandatory healthcare coverage. The winners will be the insurance and pharmaceutical industries who will have “dodged” a bullet for massive healthcare overhaul and reform. The costs to them will be a fraction of what the President’s program would have cost them and they will make it up by charging higher prices to the public. The losers will be the public who will continue to pay more for an unworkable system and doctors who will get paid less in an effort to control healthcare costs. By the way, the cost saving from the current compromise plan agreed to by the Democrats in the House is  $100 billion, the amount we sunk into General Motors and Chrysler in a futile attempt to save them from bankruptcy. As I said in my previous piece, it would appear we are more prone to spending billions saving corporate America than insuring the health of the American public.

The Democratic Party offered the American public comprehensive healthcare reform in the last two elections and the American public gave the Democratic Party the electoral majority they needed to get it done. It appears the Democrats decided that was a promise they are not willing to keep.

Morris R. Segall

Recommended reading:

Turning the Corner: GDP, Housing and Cash for Clunkers

An Open Letter to Congress

—–